Talk:Reacting games
 | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. |
I've included several references to peer-reviewed journal and other similar educational pedagogies I'm not sure what else to include to establish notability. Acrider (talk) 17:43, 7 August 2012 (UTC)
- I've included several references to peer-reviewed journal and other similar educational pedagogies I'm not sure what else to include to establish notability. Acrider (talk) 17:43, 7 August 2012 (UTC)
- 1. Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference?
- Article lacks numerous references; for instance, information under subcategory "Live action role-playing" is not common knowledge, therefore requires a citation.
- 2. Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you?
- All article content are relevant to the article topic; there are no distractions.
- 3. Is the article neutral? Are there any claims, or frames, that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
- The article is neutral. No bias was found.
- 4. Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted?
- Most references come from online newspapers or magazines. These sources are typically biased since they are based on reporters' perspectives. However, the "Reacting games" article, itself, is not ::biased.
- 5. Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
- Article is poorly edited; there are not much information. The lead paragraph, for example, is merely a sentence; more information could have been added to summarize the article. Furthermore, ::content under heading "Relationship to Other Games and Simulations" can be elaborated more, such as also including the comparisons rather than just the contrasts.
- 6. Check a few citations. Do the links work? Is there any close paraphrasing or plagiarism in the article?
- All citations with links are accessible; some citations do not include links because they are from journals or books. Information is well paraphrased. '
- 7. Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added?
- Information hasn't been largely updated for over three years. Article can discuss basic rules and unbiased strategies. ThienHuynhFIU (talk) 00:31, 27 January 2017 (UTC)