Talk:Realizational morphology
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Untitled[edit]
This content has been migrated from Wiktionary, where it did not belong. No attempt has been made to edit or verify it. Please remove this notice once the page has been edited appropiately. — Paul G 08:49, 9 August 2004 (UTC)
- moved from article page Rich Farmbrough 21:28, 3 October 2005 (UTC)
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment[edit]
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 25 August 2020 and 12 December 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): CaylMicv.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 07:51, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
form of morphology[edit]
What does form mean in form of morphology? --Backinstadiums (talk) 17:44, 5 October 2019 (UTC)
Phrasing Problems[edit]
"This theory also denies that morphemes are signs (form-content pairs). Instead, inflections are stem modifications which serve as exponents of morphological feature sets." is almost directly copied off of a website and needs to be rephrased. (https://www.wordsense.eu/realizational/#:~:text=realizational%20(English)&text=(linguistics)%20Of%20or%20relating%20to,(form%2Dcontent%20pairs).) I have also linked the website in the citations for now.
Phrasing could be improved in general. There is still a lot of information without sources.