Talk:Red Nose Day 2009

BBC Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject BBC, an attempt to better organise information in articles related to the BBC. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join us as a member. You can also visit the BBC Portal.BBCWikipedia:WikiProject BBCTemplate:WikiProject BBCBBC articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tasks for WikiProject BBC:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Improve BBC, BBC News (TV channel) and BBC News to Good Article status following previous reviews, create BBC Computer Literacy Project (in light of forthcoming 30th anniversary)
Cleanup : Chucklevision - references and general clean-up, Pebble Mill Studios - over-detailed and long, BBC World Service Television - unreferenced and confusing
Copyedit : BBC News, Broadcasting House
Expand : Top 20 start-class BBC articles with most importance: BBC Japan, BBC World Service Television, BBC Lifestyle, BBC Two Northern Ireland
NPOV : Criticism of the BBC (See comments)
Stubs : Stub-Class BBC articles
Other : *Restructure the category
- Add infoboxes to the BBC articles without infoboxes
- Add free-use images to biographical articles where possible
- Add references to Goa Mix (see assessment) and Coat of arms of the BBC
- Return Dad's Army to a Good article. (See comments)
- Reassess BBC following improvements to article.

Estimates[edit]

I think this is a good idea as it gives people a number if cheques have been handed in or if companys have given in how much they've raised 86.130.214.198 (talk) 20:45, 13 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

According to the offical site, over 80 million pounds have been donated as of late December 2009. This should be noted within the article in addition to the total raised on appeal night. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cooly123 (talk • contribs) 17:04, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

General[edit]

This page is very informative, though the appeals sections and the triva section needs more information. Also ratings should be placed in the appropriate areas as they become available. --Cooly123 (talk) 16:53, 14 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Triva?[edit]

What happened to the trivia section? There is nothing really there.--Cooly123 00:27, 31 October 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cooly123 (talk • contribs)