Talk:Redeemer Baptist Church

	Australia portal Redeemer Baptist Church is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Sydney (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Christianity Low‑importance

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Neutrality[edit]

This Talk Page and the article have been the subject of edit warring and neutrality issues. The article has been marked as requiring neutrality as the previous version reads like a brochure and does not meet encyclopaedic standards. JJCaesar (talk) 10:00, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Redeemer Baptist Church has been the subject of some controversy, especially regarding the school it operates in Sydney, the Redeemer Baptist School. It has been mentioned by members of Parliament (see http://www.parliament.nsw.gov.au/prod/parlment/HansArt.nsf/V3Key/LC20050302041 and http://www.parliament.nsw.gov.au/prod/parlment/HansArt.nsf/V3Key/LC20060921022) Skillmaster 05:07, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This article would need a significant rewrite to become neutral. It almost reads like an attack page. It has now been rewritten with reference to facts. This article resembled nothing of an objective encyclopaedia article which wikipedia strives for. The article is at this point in time, I believe, an objective article. This article needs a rewrite urgently. Temp it for now because they just got a pretty large website taken down for defamation last week. The article has now been rewritten.