Talk:Regenbald/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: maclean (talk) 05:13, 13 January 2010 (UTC)

GA review (see Wikipedia:What is a good article?)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   One image - WPCommons hosted Creative Commons image.

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   Looks good. I don't see any problems here. maclean (talk) 05:37, 13 January 2010 (UTC)