Talk:Renato Corona

impeachment

Could we get some indication of what he's being impeached for? -- AnonMoos (talk) 15:35, 10 January 2012 (UTC)

Image

Chambers of Renato C. Corona, (new Supreme Court of the Philippines building).

Please add this Feb 3, 2012 image in the article.--Ramon FVelasquez (talk) 08:07, 4 February 2012 (UTC)

Death by Wikipedia

Renato Corona was reported as dead by this article on 23 May 2012.[1] It was added and removed eighteen minutes later.[2]--♦IanMacM♦ ^{(talk to me)} 16:24, 24 May 2012 (UTC)

Edit request on 29 May 2012

Philippine Senate Impeachment trial lasting more than four months, on May 29th 2012 Supreme Court chief justice Renato Corona was convicted of violating the constitution and betraying public trust by failing to disclose his wealth in his Statement of Asset, Liabilities & Networth (SALN).

Dalimara (talk) 18:56, 29 May 2012 (UTC)

 Not done Request incoherent. Egg Centric 23:59, 31 May 2012 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Renato Corona. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120620122341/http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/cjcorona.php to http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/cjcorona.php
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100522031747/http://www.mb.com.ph/node/257841/corona-a to http://www.mb.com.ph/node/257841/corona-a
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131202234257/http://www.sunstar.com.ph/manila/chief-justice-appointment-explained to http://www.sunstar.com.ph/manila/chief-justice-appointment-explained
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120607191726/http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/publications/benchmark/2010/04/041002.php to http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/publications/benchmark/2010/04/041002.php
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120602125221/http://www.manilatimes.net/index.php/opinion/columnist1/23912-legal-conundrums-in-the-impeachment-trial to http://manilatimes.net/index.php/opinion/columnist1/23912-legal-conundrums-in-the-impeachment-trial

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:19, 26 November 2017 (UTC)

Update

Could use some recent devs.

https://www.manilatimes.net/2022/11/07/opinion/columns/lady-justice-finally-rules-chief-justice-corona-innocent/1865296/amp

https://newsinfo.inquirer.net/1688851/sandigan-junks-forfeiture-cases-vs-late-ex-cj-corona-assets-not-in-saln-not-unexplained-wealth

https://newsinfo.inquirer.net/1689119/graft-court-on-corona-case-saln-not-a-weapon

— Preceding unsigned comment added by 143.44.164.211 (talk) 15:19, 7 November 2022 (UTC) 

doctoral degree controversy section

Many of the descriptions in this section are verging on opinion. For example: "Marites Dañguilan Vitug of the now defunct and highly discredited online "journalism" site Rappler, which was shut down by a unanimous decision of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) for violating the constitutional provision banning foreign ownership in media". The phrase "highly discredited" (according to whom) is inappropriate to the section. Also why put "journalism" in quotes. And the site Rappler is not defunct. It still exists.

The latter half of the first paragraph is more on discrediting the news site Rappler rather than talking about the actual doctoral degree controversy.

This section needs a lot of editing. And proper references must be used. Most of the references in this section are opinion pieces (references 27 and 28 are not news articles but columns in the opinions section). 72.110.230.117 (talk) 23:04, 15 May 2023 (UTC)

Highly agree with this. The general tone of the entire page is far from neutral and sounds like an effort to rehabilitate the person. Highlama (talk) 09:08, 23 May 2023 (UTC)