This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics articles
The data in this article comes from 2010, but since 2010 the Renminbi has generally been accepted as overvalued or slightly undervalued (the differing opinions are whether the recent market-driven depreciations are to reflect speculation or the fundamental values). Most of the article needs to be changed. ZhaJiangLiu (talk) 17:22, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, the entire article was quite weird because it was written as an indictment rather than an explanation. I've trimmed it from its worst parts but it remains unbalanced: it would be more interesting to describe the various forces which play in the field, things like the capital controls in Hong Kong, the operation of the flexible peg, being an export-led economy with a giant surplus, the coordination with fiscal and trade policy and so on.
Ultimately, this article should probably be merged to Monetary policy of China. (Which, oddly, describes only the recent official Chinese view.) Nemo 21:30, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
