Talk:Reserve requirement/Archives/2016

The endogenous money view.

I recently added a reference to this document as support for the statement "Some economists dispute the conventional theory of the reserve requirement". The document includes statements such as "nor do they ‘multiply up’ central bank money to create new loans and deposits" and "Another common misconception is that the central bank determines the quantity of loans and deposits in the economy by controlling the quantity of central bank money — the so-called ‘money multiplier’ approach." SPECIFICO reverted this additional reference with the ungrammatical comment "Source does not misattributed to article text." which presumably means he thinks that my reference does not support the statement. I think he's wrong. Can we have another opinion? Reissgo (talk) 07:01, 30 September 2016 (UTC)