Talk:Resonant interaction

Books[edit]

Some books that supposedly cover the topic. I have not seen the books:

R. W. Boyd, Nonlinear Optics, Academic Press, San Diego, CA, 2003.
O. M. Phillips, The Dynamics of the Upper Ocean, (2nd ed.), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1977.
A. D. D. Craik, Wave Interactions and Fluid Flows, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1985.

67.198.37.16 (talk) 16:11, 17 September 2020‎ (UTC)[reply]

Proposal to Remove RRM References[edit]

There's a few flaws with the RRM content. The first major one is that it's not actually physics - but instead is actually homeopathy dressed up in science language. The author (Cosic) seems to publish into those journals, and there's no meaningful peer recognition of it. Secondly the content is poorly written - almost confrontational in tone. The underlying page on it that it's linking was deleted, seemingly for similar reasons.

If nobodies got any objections to it, I'll remove this from the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cobalt612 (talk • contribs) 10:18, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I restored the content (Note: I wrote more or less this entire article.) What makes you think it's "homeopathy"? Famously, "do you have references for that?" I read the RRM papers, they seem to be fine -- brilliant, even. There's even been recent activity in this field, where some of the deep-learning neural net solutions to protein-folding using the RRM in conjunction with the Born Oppenheimer approximation. Coming from OpenAI or somewhere like that. Or at least, so it was explained to me, just last night, over drinks. 67.198.37.16 (talk) 03:49, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]