Talk:Resurrection Man (character)

	Comics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! If you would like to participate, you can help with the current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project's talk page.ComicsWikipedia:WikiProject ComicsTemplate:WikiProject ComicsComics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by DC Comics work group.

Fictional characters

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character articles

Untitled[edit]

Are there any instances of Mitch reappearing after the cancellation of his series? -69.249.92.211 16:57, 20 August 2006 (UTC) yes in the new 52![reply]

Categories[edit]

I've moved this back to DC Comics Immortals. If there;s debate over wether or not the categories should exit then the category can be nominated for deletion/merging with Category:Fictional Immortals. Until that happens this page belongs in Category:DC Comics Immortals. Palendrom 02:59, 19 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Notable deaths/powers[edit]

The list in the article ought to give mention of which issues these deaths, and the powers granted by them, occurred. Kouban 05:06, 12 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Powers as a woman[edit]

I don't think being a woman is a super power, should we specify that ressurection man(/woman?) has no powers beyond feminine intuition? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.125.136.225 (talk) 11:33, 21 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Normal resurrectionman.jpg[edit]

Image:Normal resurrectionman.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 17:22, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move[edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Moved (non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis (talk) 04:44, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The request to rename this article to Resurrection Man (comics) has been carried out.

Resurrection Man → Resurrection Man (comics) – Wiki ViewStats seems to be down, and stats.grok.se can't tell me how many of these http://stats.grok.se/en/201402/Resurrection%20Man 2059] views were for this page versus the dab at Resurrection man. (I'm not sure if Wiki ViewStats can distinguish on capitalization anyway.) So this may beat out Resurrection Man (film) in views, it may not, and the results may be skewed either way by the comic character being at the base title (for one capitalization). Either way, I don't think the character meets WP:PRIMARYTOPIC's criterion for long-term significance of the film or the Eoin McNamee novel on which it was based. I'd rather have the base title redirect to the dab. BDD (talk) 19:12, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Support - doesn't seem like a primary topic, redirect to resurrection man dab. In ictu oculi (talk) 23:28, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Resurrection Man (comics). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130106000000/http://www.comicsalliance.com/2011/06/07/dc-comics-dark-swamp-thing-animal-man to http://www.comicsalliance.com/2011/06/07/dc-comics-dark-swamp-thing-animal-man

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:10, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]