Talk:Reunion (video game)

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Jack Marston (Red Dead) (5 participants)
Joshua Tomar (5 participants)
Juhani (Star Wars) (3 participants)
Starwing Paradox (2 participants)
Pit (Kid Icarus) (13 participants)
Vette (Star Wars) (6 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Gameplay[edit]

This article could use a gameplay section to discuss how the game works. SharkD 03:06, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Reunion Amiga box.jpg[edit]

Image:Reunion Amiga box.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 20:51, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Trim[edit]

I've trimmed this Wiki. Heavily. Most of this stuff has no place being here, it belongs in a strategy guide.--Human.v2.0 (talk) 19:30, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Also, I was just checking the external links to see if I could use them as references anywhere... this entire article is just copy/paste from them folks. --Human.v2.0 (talk) 19:30, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Genre[edit]

Why is this categorized as "adventure"? Since it is a Master of Orion clone, it belongs to the 4X genre. pictureuploader (talk) 06:30, 27 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It is considered adventure as it is different from a 4X game. It has a story and a goal. It has scripted events which occur at certain times or when certain conditions are met. The AI isn't really an AI, it is just scripted events. Every play through is almost exactly the same, the only major thing that changes is the way you play it. In contrast to this, a normal 4X style game is often highly random each time you play. You can play it exactly the same way and have completely different results. Also the other sides are played by AI, which usually are playing by the same rules you are. It is far from a Master of Orion clone and I would only recommend it to someone who likes Master of Orion if they also enjoy adventure games or perhaps detective style games. I suppose the main thing I'm trying to say is that this game is linear and scripted, whereas 4X games are open and random. --75.182.24.129 (talk) 21:33, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It is not a Master of Orion clone, but a Millennium 2.2 and Deuteros clone. Those are existed way before MoO.

Also the game has been released in the spring of 1994, while MoO was released in 1993 September. The half year what separates the two games, would not have been enough to develop it, so obviously, the development has started before the release of MoO.

Impossible to add new line to reviews[edit]

I Cannot add this line to the review table:

| GURU = 92/100<ref name="GURU-Reunion">{{cite journal |date=April 1994 |title=GURU - Issue #20 (1994/04) |url=https://retroujsag.com/adatok/retroujsag/guru/download.php?file=guru_1994-04.pdf |journal= |location= |author= |publisher= |issue=20 |page=84 |quote="" |accessdate=December 28, 2019}}</ref>

I had to add it separately.

And this:

| Amiga Joker = {{rating|85|100}}<ref name="Amiga Joker-Reunion">{{cite journal |date=March 1994 |title=Amiga Joker - Issue 45 |url=http://amr.abime.net/issue_1590_pages |journal= |location= |author= |publisher= |issue=45 |page=20 |quote="Ganz weit draußen im Weltall des Jahres 2621 gibt es einen Wegpunkt, wo sich die Spielprinzipien von "Elite-2" und "Dune 2" kreuzen: Den hat Grandslam endeckt und ein hochkomplexes Game daraus gemacht!" |accessdate=October 14, 2020}}</ref>

Wiki editor is useless...