This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Socialism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of socialism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SocialismWikipedia:WikiProject SocialismTemplate:WikiProject Socialismsocialism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics articles
During a minor edit of the Vanguardism article I noticed the term, and it occurred to me that a mundanely-looking collocation "revolutionary"+"situation" is in fact a part of the formal Marxist parlance a non-suspecting reader might be unaware of. Hence the stub. -No.Altenmann >t 06:41, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
@Altenmann: re-write "This article put forth two conditions" to something else. I don't prefer "this article", there are better ways. OccultZone (Talk) 06:48, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Well, English is not my best. I tried another version. Whoever is interested may fix and/or expand. I am not really a Marxist to care much :-) -No.Altenmann >t 06:53, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]