Talk:Riddiculous

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Did you know nomination[edit]

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by SL93 (talk) 16:24, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Created by Launchballer (talk) and Max263 (talk). Nominated by Launchballer (talk) at 18:02, 10 November 2022 (UTC).[reply]

  • Both articles are DYK eligible and I didn't detect any close paraphrasing. The hook facts are cited inline in both articles and are verified in the source. QPQ check says you have five DYK credits: can you confirm if these were your own nominations, or were they just credits? If you have five DYK nominations, you need to review another DYK nomination to provide a QPQ (in this case, as you've nominated two articles, you need to give two QPQs). I also have reservations about the hook: it doesn't seem to be intriguing to readers who are unfamiliar with The Play That Goes Wrong (like I am). Can other hooks be proposed here that may have broader appeal? If a double hook is not feasible, I could suggest proposing two separate hooks: one for Lewis and one for Riddiculous. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 10:50, 16 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • I'm sorry, I can't get behind the notion that Riddiculous is DYK-eligible – all of the prose is sourced to the first episode of the show. Another source is an ITV press release, and the final source doesn't look like reputable journalism either. theleekycauldron (talkcontribs) (she/her) 00:16, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • I don't think I'm going to be able to do much to Riddiculous. Either run a hook with it unbolded or ask Max263.--Launchballer 11:44, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
      • There just aren't really enough sources available, so it might be best to run the DYK with Riddiculous unbolded. Max263 (talkcontribs) 12:47, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Launchballer: If a new hook is not proposed within a reasonable timeframe, the nomination may be marked for closure for lack of a suitable hook. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 01:27, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
ALT2 ... that Riddiculous Riddlemaster Henry Lewis has appeared in The Play That Goes Wrong, Peter Pan Goes Wrong, Magic Goes Wrong and The Goes Wrong Show?--Launchballer 03:14, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I think it would be best for another reviewer to take a look at the new hook. I've struck the original two but I'm still mixed on the new one, so perhaps a fresh set of eyes can give a fresh look here. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 06:52, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • for ALT2 (which I've bolded above). The hook is interesting enough, in my opinion, and is verified by inline citations. Rest of the review as per Narutolovehinata5 above. 97198 (talk) 22:28, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Awards and nominations need to be cited. SL93 (talk) 08:58, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
They are now.--Launchballer 10:15, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. SL93 (talk) 16:22, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]