Talk:Riley's Lock

Riley's Lock has been listed as one of the Geography and places good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: October 9, 2021. (Reviewed version).

Riley's Lock (final version) received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which on 18 August 2021 was archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article.

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Riley's Lock/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Tim riley (talk · contribs) 20:47, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I peer reviewed this article some weeks ago and found nothing much to quibble about. I suppose in the interests of full disclosure I should add that to the best of my knowledge I am no connection with the Riley of Riley's Lock, and, that done, I am pleased to promote this article, which seems to me to meet all the GA criteria: Tim riley talk 20:47, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Overall summary[edit]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose quality:

B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. References to sources:
Well referenced.

B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
Well referenced.

C. No original research:
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects:

B. Focused:
Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias:
Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc:
Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
Well illustrated.

B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
Well illustrated.
Overall:
Pass or Fail:

@Tim riley: Thank you so much! TwoScars (talk) 18:48, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]