Talk:Riverfront Towers

This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Michigan: Detroit Low‑importance

	Michigan portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Michigan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Michigan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MichiganWikipedia:WikiProject MichiganTemplate:WikiProject MichiganMichigan articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Detroit task force.

Skyscrapers Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skyscrapers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles that relate to skyscrapers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkyscrapersWikipedia:WikiProject SkyscrapersTemplate:WikiProject SkyscrapersSkyscraper articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Architecture Low‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Same building Rosa Parks lived in?[edit]

??? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.1.156.204 (talk) 08:27, 22 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Someone made a mistake[edit]

There is no way this should be redicted from "Riverfront Towers." It's actually the opposite. Since these aren't all condominiums, there is no reason why the title of the article should be Riverfront Condominiums. I'm going to figure out how to change it back. --Criticalthinker (talk) 23:29, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hadn't been here in awhile. This article needs a MAJOR reconstruction. It reads like a negative apartments.com review; it is not consistent with how we do property or architecture pages here. A "Crime" section with a single sentence? "Brown water"? Are you all serious? --Criticalthinker (talk) 10:12, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with Criticalthinker, and add that the quality of the writing could be improved dramatically. "Riverfront Towers had 27 vehicles broken into stealing electronics in 2016" perhaps might be edited to "at Riverfront Towers in 2016, 27 vehicles were broken into and had electronics stolen from them." That may not be perfect, but it's certainly an improvement... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2604:2D80:5503:2400:5097:5D67:42EE:A6CD (talk) 05:57, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]