Talk:Rochdale Principles

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
WikiProject iconCooperatives C‑class (inactive)
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Cooperatives, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.
CThis article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Cooperative Principles vs. Rochdale Principles[edit]

In my experience, the principles by which most cooperatives today conduct themselves are known as the Cooperative Principles. The Rochdale Principles, as laid out by the Rochdale pioneers, are the origin of the Cooperative Principles, but the term refers to the original incarnation of them. I'm wondering if most of the information on this page might not be more appropriate on a page called Cooperative Principles (not to be confused with the Cooperative principle of course). Thoughts? Gobonobo 04:20, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

  • I strongly support the suggestion to collect all the articles currently in Category:Cooperative principles into a single general article called Cooperative principles (or Cooperative Principles as some may prefer to call it), which furthermore should be separate and distinct from the existing particular article Rochdale Principles. Today Cooperative principles redirct to Rochdale Principles, and this redirect will need to be eliminated. --Zlerman (talk) 13:15, 28 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    • My thought: merge the principles articles into (sections of) this one: they can always be broken out again later when their length becomes unfeasible. --Hroðulf (or Hrothulf) (Talk) 14:45, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
If all the articles have been merged here, we can't merge and delete them 'cuz of GFDL attribution clauses. I'm redirecting all the pages instead of deleting. Cheers. --lifebaka (Talk - Contribs) 13:11, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Rochdale Principles. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:47, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Rochdale Principles. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:27, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Issues[edit]

This article is sourced with only primary sources. Policies and guidelines mandate (WP:PSTS#5) Do not base an entire article on primary sources, and be cautious about basing large passages on them. If reliable and independent sources cannot be found the article could be subjected to AFD. -- Otr500 (talk) 11:38, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]