Talk:Rock Lodge Club

This article reads like an advertisement

The article should be fixed to make it properly encyclopedic, or it should be deleted. I'm leaning toward deletion. If only I could figure out how to propose such a thing, then I would certainly do so. Bloodbeard 17:15, 2 September 2007 (UTC)

Aha, I am victor. If someone could figure out how to fix this article and make it not an advertisement, then I would certainly be amenable and willing to remove the deletion tag. Otherwise, it's up for deletion. I am the scourge. Wikipedia is not (supposed to be) an advertising service. Bloodbeard 17:29, 2 September 2007 (UTC)

"Families, couples and individuals are welcome to visit the club." This kind of shit still lingers in the article: such an edit is exactly what I did not want. I could have done that myself, fer fuck's sake. I would bitch more, but I'm a lazy bastard. However, TALK PAGES EXIST FOR A FUCKING REASON. I'm not angry—just manic. Graah. Bloodbeard 18:32, 2 September 2007 (UTC)

• I would go a bit stronger in characterizing your actions and demeanor than the self-described "bastard", but I remind you that even bastards such as yourself are authorized to edit articles. Edit tools exist for a reason. Stop "bitching" and butcher away to your satisfaction. Alansohn 20:11, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Sorry, sir. I had a momentary lapse of sanity. Grandiosity or somesuch; I'm not trying to be funny here. I try to take responsibility for my actions, however, and I will thus do as you ask. Aside from the part that you removed, the wording in other parts of the article didn't seem objective and "encyclopedic" enough to me. Really, I just got carried away over very little and acted irrationally and impulsively. I know this must seem very odd to you, but, regardless, I apologize for my actions and the needless bother I have caused you. I'd like to say this doesn't happen very often, but it does. Alas. I will get to editing [the article] within the day. Bloodbeard 20:58, 2 September 2007 (UTC)

Okay, it's good now. The offending sentence has been removed. The article could probably benefit from better citing of sources, but that is beside the point; and being something of a prude, I don't care to go about browsing nudist pages. Really, some of those sites look and read like soft-core porn sites. Now, if you don't mind: would it be possible to remove all of the nonsense that I wrote on this talk page? It's a bit embarrassing. However, since I involved you in this, I won't do anything without your consent. Thank you for your patience. Probably. Bloodbeard 14:05, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

• AGA Rock Lodge Newspaper Ad 1940s.jpeg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 19:37, 23 May 2020 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

• Rock Lodge Stone House circa 1938.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 20:07, 23 May 2020 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

• Rock Lodge Stone House circa 1938.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 00:19, 23 January 2021 (UTC)