Talk:Rodney Street, Liverpool

Merseyside Low‑importance

	North West England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Merseyside, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Merseyside-related articles. In so doing it works and collaborates with its mother project WikiProject UK Geography. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. Please also feel free to join in the discussions on the project's talk page.MerseysideWikipedia:WikiProject MerseysideTemplate:WikiProject MerseysideMerseyside articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Highways: United Kingdom Low‑importance

	Roads portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Highways, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of highways on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HighwaysWikipedia:WikiProject HighwaysTemplate:WikiProject HighwaysHighways articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the United Kingdom Roads Task Force.

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Rodney Street, Liverpool. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061109005341/http://www.mersey-gateway.org/chambrehardman/ to http://www.mersey-gateway.org/chambrehardman/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:17, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Harley Street of the North[edit]

I whizzed through quite a few articles on Liverpool streets earlier today, adding links for the Paradise St article, Like that one, I was astonished at how poor a lot of the content was but I was only skimming stuff. Perhaps there is nothing more to say but in this article, among other issues, it made an unsourced claim that Rodney St is known as the Harley Street of the North. It may well be but I removed it because (a) it was not sourced and (b) who knows it as that? In my edit summary I noted that John Street in Manchester has a similar set-up of posh private consulting rooms in Georgian era houses and I know some people have referred to it as being akin to Harley Street, so the chances are that the Rodney Street version is a local term, not something disseminated more widely.

I really don't care - I live in both cities, as well as somewhere else - except from the perspective of our policies and guidelines. In this case, WP:V and WP:NPOV would seem to apply. There are plenty of ways to phrase things to avoid NPOV issues but first we need to see what the sources say. And I do mean sources, not source. - Sitush (talk) 15:54, 9 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Lists and prose[edit]

We prefer prose to lists. Those people who are mentioned in the section on buildings - Chambre, Gladstone etc - should not also be in the list. It isn't as if this is a massive, complex article, so the reader should not need to be reminded. - Sitush (talk) 18:39, 9 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Over 60 Grade II listed buildings?[edit]

There are a lot of listed buildings, not all of which are what the ordinary person would call a building, eg: the Mackenzie Monument, but try as I might I cannot get to the 60+ figure. I think the solution may to be, er, list them. Since UK listed buildings are inherently notable, they all should or could have standalone articles. - Sitush (talk) 03:30, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Do not use Good News Liverpool[edit]

Please do not use the Good News Liverpool website as a source in this article. For example, their article of 2016 is pretty much a copy of how ours looked in 2015, together with various linked bio articles. I suspect GNL is not reliable for anything but certainly in this case it is a mirror. - Sitush (talk) 03:48, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]