Talk:Roger Ailes/Archives/2014

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Revising

Ive done some major revising on this page. I added a new section and tommorrow I will add the links and stuff. Im just wiped out, I do to much editing and revising. --Zonerocks 07:24, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

Wikiproject for biography is trying to take credit for this article? What a joke. I think iglli and I have done to most work in keeping this article in one piece. --Zonerocks 07:01, 20 August 2006 (UTC)

Is that all there is?

A previous entry suggested that some editorial license was taken to remove content here. Whitewash was the term employed, if memory serves.

I believe it. I was struck at the paucity of information contained on this page. I see no mention of where Ailes currently resides, or information pertaining to his wife, children, or anything personal which is attendant for every other notable figure from Nobel laureats to former Presidential hopefuls.

The absence of information suggests to me there is something to hide. Know nothing of the man, this leaves me profoundly suspicous of the man and of the minions who might wish to hide the details -- and flaws? -- of his career? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.204.201.62 (talk) 06:04, 2 November 2009 (UTC)

Also: what is his religious affiliations and/or beliefs? Certainly this would be a noteable fact that most of his fans wouldn't object to sharing (unless, of course, it is embarassing too; perhaps he may be a bit of a hypocrit in this area?). BTW, I've noticed that the article on Rupert Murdoch used to say that he (Murdoch) was a Roman Catholic, but now it just says he's "Christian" (did he formally leave Catholicism or is he just being more vague nowadays?). Anyway, back to Ailes, certainly anyone of this stature pondering (or alleged to be pondering) a run for the U.S. Presidency is fair game for a stab at what [specifically] their views on religion are; Lord knows they (the pundits, et. al.) over-scrutinize all the rest, particularly Mitt Romney and Barack Obama. Shanoman (talk) 04:37, 6 September 2010 (UTC)

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/02/25/nyregion/25roger-ailes.html?_r=2&hp Ailes holds a smoking gun. It looks like he might be able to make it go away, just by coughing up $11 million of FOX's money, probably not too difficult for Mr Ailes. According to the Columbia Journalism Review, he has probably already destroyed the evidence. Banjoboye (talk) 16:20, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

Fox chief to blame for Fox’s election night meltdown

http://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/ailes-book-fox-poll-denialism-came-top

Notable enough to add here? Hcobb (talk) 23:31, 11 January 2014 (UTC)

This sentence doesn't make sense

"Rush, who had been a life-support system for a butt cyst, became his right hand at Ailes Communications, working on most of the political campaigns that the company handled in the 1980s." … I also think a source may need to be cited for that. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.250.217.144 (talk) 17:52, 16 January 2014 (UTC)