Talk:Ron Goldman/Archives/2016

Why is this in the the category: usolved murders?

We all know who murdered jim. Just because "the authorities" in your country consider it unsolved doesn't mean wikipedia does, by this logic the Tiananmen Square Massacre article should also be deleted.--Greasysteve13 05:40, 5 March 2006 (UTC)

It's unwise to use "we" , you should not presume to know other people's opinions. It also should be noted that the "authorities" did not find OJ innocent , rather a jury of 12 of his peers did.68.71.35.93 21:27, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

No, one jury of his peers found him "not guilty". They didn't find him innocent. Another jury of his peers found him liable for two deaths. - Nunh-huh 21:30, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

Innocent until proven guilty. Since he was proven "Not Guilty" and cannot be tried for the case again, no matter how guilty he is, it's not wrong to say he was found innocent. That doesn't mean he isn't guilty. Of course he is. Just not in a court of law.

IDIOTS! THERE IS NO SUCH VERDICT AS "INNOCENT" ANYWHERE, IN ANY COURT OF LAW ON EARTH (OR "BEYOND")! YOUR INFANTILE, MASTURBATORY RAGE SEEPS THROUGH PLAINLY, AS IF YOU CAN'T "HOLD-YOUR-WATER"!!! --184.207.8.204 (talk) 00:51, 31 January 2016 (UTC)Veryverser