Talk:Ronnie Stephenson

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Jazz

	Jazz portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Jazz, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of jazz on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JazzWikipedia:WikiProject JazzTemplate:WikiProject JazzJazz articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Biography: Musicians

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians.

Untitled[edit]

I think his name is Ronnie Stephenson and NOT Ronnie Stevenson!

True. The article text was right, the title wrong. The page has been moved to the correct title now. Fan-1967 18:24, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

toned down and tidied up![edit]

However much we might appreciate the person/band etc. about whom we are writing, wikipedia is not a fan page and does not have opinions. I realise that there are a lot of articles out there which have obviously been written by someone's PR agent, but let's try to make them stand out for what they are - hype. Serious musicians deserve a higher standard. 83.180.128.128 22:45, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

deleted text[edit]

Have just deleted the following:

He had an amazing technical ability and an incredible sense of time.

As the previous comment suggests, such language, though all-too-common in Wikipedia articles, is not suitable for an encyclopedia. Regards, --Technopat 23:19, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cleanup[edit]

Some of the too many paragraphs consist of one sentence only. BNutzer (talk) 22:22, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]