Talk:Royal Rumble (2007)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Royal Rumble (2007) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1

Royal Rumble (2007) has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
July 30, 2008	Good article nominee	Listed

Professional wrestling Low‑importance

	Royal Rumble (2007) is within the scope of WikiProject Professional wrestling, an attempt to improve and standardize articles related to professional wrestling. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, visit the project to-do page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to discussions.Professional wrestlingWikipedia:WikiProject Professional wrestlingTemplate:WikiProject Professional wrestlingProfessional wrestling articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: Texas Mid‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Texas portal This article is supported by WikiProject Texas (assessed as Mid-importance).

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Professional wrestling#Countout|counted out]] The anchor (#Countout) is no longer available because it was deleted by a user before.
[[Professional wrestling#Disqualification|disqualified]] The anchor (#Disqualification) is no longer available because it was deleted by a user before.
[[Professional wrestling#Disqualification|disqualification]] The anchor (#Disqualification) is no longer available because it was deleted by a user before.
[[Professional wrestling#Countout|countout]] The anchor (#Countout) is no longer available because it was deleted by a user before.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

WHC Match[edit]

Is it notable to add in the event section that Kennedy literally had Batista pinned several times over when the ref was unconscious? It wasn't notable in a summary like the article used to have, but it seems pretty noteworthy in an expanded article. Opinions? Gavyn Sykes (talk) 20:41, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know, it's not really a rare thing since it happens a lot when a ref is knocked out (although it's usually a face pinning a heel rather than a heel pinning a face). TJ Spyke 20:43, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

True, though the fact that it was a reverse of the usual may be a point towards it. I wouldn't call it notable if it was a few separate pins. But as JBL put it "He had him pinned for a ten count!" Gavyn Sykes (talk) 21:01, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WTH happened?[edit]

The commentator table is gone, and the section looks like crap... Gavyn Sykes (talk) 04:03, 2 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cena pic[edit]

it's wrong. Why is he holding the championship the wrong way?SimonKSK (talk) 02:05, 2 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That's just how he was holding it when the screenshot was taken. –L A X 04:04, 2 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Royal Rumble (2007)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Okay, the article's looking pretty good right now and there are just a few things that may need fixing:

Both screenshots and probably the poster too need to be scaled down to low-resolution to comply with fair use standards.
with 13 from Raw, 10 from SmackDown!, and 7 from ECW -- these numbers can all be spelled out in one word.
Umaga attacked him, and kayfabe injuring Cena's spleen -- I've never heard "kayfabe" before, but could you double-check the grammar is right here? Again, I wouldn't know, but to me it would make sense not to have an "and" in there.
Is he "Undertaker" or "The Undertaker"? Article uses both, so pick one and make sure there's consistency.
Thus, the match at the Royal Rumble, remained a singles match -- don't need 2nd comma.

Done. --L A X 10:41, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think that's about it. You've got seven days to make these fixes, and good luck. —97198 talk 07:07, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

By scaling down the images, I mean re-uploading them under the same name, but smaller. —97198 talk 10:45, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I know. I missed that when I was going through the article. --L A X 15:37, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

OK, looks great. Free images are usually best :) The size of the poster is fine, but the only thing is that I moved Batista's image from right to left because it was conflicting with the infobox on my browser. Nice work, I'm going to go ahead and pass the article. —97198 talk 06:18, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What about[edit]

The order of the eliminations... look at the article and look at this. --KingOfDX (talk) 01:09, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 7 external links on Royal Rumble (2007). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:59, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]