This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject EastEnders, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the popular BBCsoap operaEastEnders on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EastEndersWikipedia:WikiProject EastEndersTemplate:WikiProject EastEndersEastEnders articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Soap Operas, an effort to build consistent guidelines for and improve articles about soap operas and telenovelas on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit WikiProject Soap Operas, where you can join the project and/or the discussion.Soap OperasWikipedia:WikiProject Soap OperasTemplate:WikiProject Soap Operassoap opera articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character articles
Do we change it now to the most recent publicity image? Or is it too soon? I think she's still recognisable from her previous image.--5 albert square (talk) 11:18, 21 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I'd say change it. Maybe move the image of Lytton in her earlier stint into the article and caption it and put the newer one in the infobox. Louisa has grown up from a 16-year-old kid to a 29-year-old woman. Grangehilllover (talk) 11:57, 21 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The article certainly doesn't need three non-free images. It should lose one of the early ones at least. - JuneGloom07Talk 17:17, 21 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think the new one needs to be added yet as we haven't actually seen Ruby like this yet. I do agree with JuneGloom07 - there is no reason to have three non-free images. I suggest we remove the screenshot and keep the old promo in the infobox until she returns. When she returns, the old promo can be moved to Creation and development and the new one can be added to the infobox. Soaper1234 - talk 17:25, 21 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I think that's a good idea. If the new image is deleted, it can always be restored by an admin. - JuneGloom07Talk 19:03, 21 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oops, didn't realise this discussion was here, but I thought the best option was the new promo image in the infobox and the old promo image replacing the screenshot, so that's what I did. I'm not sure there's much point in waiting to add the new promo but if the concern is that she hasn't appeared yet then maybe they could just be swapped. — ᴀnemoneᴘroᴊecтors 20:47, 24 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Too many IPS are making edits stating that Ruby has left permanently. Maternity leave doesn’t count as a permanent absence from the show, what should we do? WikiFlame50 (talk) 10:03, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I've noticed that as well WikiFlame50 To my knowledge she has only said that she may not return. To me that's not saying that she won't return. There was also an article said that she was easing back into work. She may be back as Ruby.-- 5 albert square (talk) 19:57, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
