This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject South Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of South Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.South AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject South AfricaTemplate:WikiProject South AfricaSouth Africa articles
It appears the creator of this page, Mulaudzi8, has deliberately been 'sanitising' the content in order to present a better view of this politician. No doubt he works and is paid by the political party and should refrain from removing anything his political masters don't like. This is not what Wikipedia is about! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.177.21.171 (talk) 20:11, 5 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I've added in / altered some text to cover both the allegations and the outcome of the investigation into them. If we're going to mention the former, I don't see what the case is for not also mentioning the latter? I've checked the text against the cited sources to make sure it's in line with them, so hopefully that covers all the issues there have been in the back and forth editing recently. Markpackuk (talk) 10:10, 14 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Adding the outcome of an investigation is reasonable, so long as the controversy is not hidden or buried amongst the main paragraphs. I believe this is the vandal's intent. Ironically, the main Democratic Alliance page has a separate section for controversy, so they have set the precedent themselves. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.177.65.121 (talk) 12:08, 19 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
