This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Awards, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of awards and prizes on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AwardsWikipedia:WikiProject AwardsTemplate:WikiProject Awardsawards articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Literature, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Literature on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LiteratureWikipedia:WikiProject LiteratureTemplate:WikiProject LiteratureLiterature articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Thailand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Thailand-related articles on Wikipedia. The WikiProject is also a part of the Counteracting systematic bias group aiming to provide a wider and more detailed coverage on countries and areas of the encyclopedia which are notably less developed than the rest. If you would like to help improve this and other Thailand-related articles, please join the project. All interested editors are welcome.ThailandWikipedia:WikiProject ThailandTemplate:WikiProject ThailandThailand articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Southeast Asia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Southeast Asia-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Southeast AsiaWikipedia:WikiProject Southeast AsiaTemplate:WikiProject Southeast AsiaSoutheast Asia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
A bot will list this discussion on requested moves' current discussions subpage within an hour of this tag being placed. The discussion may be closed 7 days after being opened, if consensus has been reached (see the closing instructions). Please base arguments on article title policy, and keep discussion succinct and civil.
S.E.A. Write Award → SEA Write Award – MOS:ABBR, MOS:TM. Wikipedia doesn't use "X.Y.Z." old-fashioned acronym/initialism stylization, even when some external entity prefers it. A quick review of external source material [1][2][3][4] about this subject shows that numerous other publishers also write it "SEA Write Award[s]" not "S.E.A. Write Award[s]", following their own internal style guides, as we certainly should. (Indeed, it appears that the actual majority do, outside of a certain sector of news publishers, but Wikipedia is not written in news style as a matter of policy, anyway.) There is nothing "magically special" about this case that demands an exception. It is entirely sufficient that the dot-laden version will redirect to the more WP:CONCISE and WP:CONSISTENT dotless title. — SMcCandlish☏¢ 😼 02:37, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral. Looking above, it appears I was the one who suggested renaming to the current punctuation back in 2006. The dotted version still seems to dominates Google's top results, but I'll defer to those more familiar with the naming conventions. --Paul_012 (talk) 18:55, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nothing about our manual of style ever, for any reason, has anything to do with "Google's top results". This is not an SEO popularity contest, and Google (or other search engine) top results for most subjects are virtually always news publications, which follow their own style that in many ways diverges from encyclopedic and other academic writing (and in particular very often kowtows to stylization preferences of trademark holders while WP has an entire guideline against doing that). Repeat: Wikipedia is not written in news style, per policy. — SMcCandlish☏¢ 😼 09:45, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
