Talk:SNH48

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

If you have anything, please talk and discuss it here, thanks!

Note from me[edit]

I've added citation for SNH48, edited some mistake at "overseas transfer", removed the deletion tag and others.

But please note that my English might not so good, so try to edit to make it more readable by public peoples!

I'm using Malaysian English as it is my third language (after Malay language and Chinese language) when adding those informations based on SNH48 official website. I can read/write/understand basic Chinese but not so much because I've stopped learning Chinese when I graduated from SJK(C)Chung Hwa Sungai Lalang (Chinese-medium primary school which uses Chinese) and entered SMK Bedong (Normal national-type secondary school which uses Malay).

And again, I hope you all can help expanding the article! Thank you.

AKB48, SKE48, NMB48, HKT48, JKT48, TPE48 (Japanese Wiki), SNH48, FIGHTING!

I think the next thing I should do is move back TPE48 which has been deleted back to online, I might copy it from the Japanese Wikipedia article about TPE48 and re-translate the whole thing from Japanese language into English via Chinese language. I had to translate it VIA Chinese because I'm still new to Japanese and much more things to learn! Thank you ありがとう!

-- やちゃん /Muhammad Nur Hidayat /喜达亚 (talk | contribs | email) 18:03, 14 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Major overhaul[edit]

Hi, i am very sorry to have removed the controversy chapter, even if someone has put some effort into it. Please be aware that Wikipedia provides notable content, which has been cited in reliable sources, as per WP:N and WP:RS. The chapter in question only featured a single reference from a tieba forum, which can not be identified as reliable. I also edited some parts of the introduction. Rka001 (talk) 23:30, 17 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Mass removal of information[edit]

I have noticed that SNH48's history from 2014 onwards has been removed from the page, and that makes the article seem outdated. Currently, there is a need to reorganise the information and put them in prose form instead of bullet points, and secondary references are needed to back up these information.--LMX97 (talk) 02:55, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]