This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles
This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Shipwrecks, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of shipwreck-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ShipwrecksWikipedia:WikiProject ShipwrecksTemplate:WikiProject ShipwrecksShipwreck articles
Clean up typos Currently working on it-----Completed!
Improve grammar
Add any additions if needed Still adding more information
Discuss desired additions -None
discrepancy on the depth and wreck not located[edit]
There's a discrepancy in that the intro states that the wreck is in 320 feet of water and is on the national historic register, whereas later it's stated that no one has been able to find or salvage the wreck. Anyone know enough to clear this up? Dwarfyperson (talk) 08:09, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Dwarfyperson, that has been fixed now that the wreck has been located. In the Sinking section it still had that she sank in 320 feet (98 m) of water. I'm assuming the location of where she started to go under was either known or estimated. Initially, I left that 320-foot mention in place because the sinking apparently happened during ebb tide meaning the vessel would have been carried further out to sea as she fell to the bottom. I assume the water depth at the estimated spot where she went under is 320 feet though the depth at the spot where she's now resting is 287 feet.
Unfortunately, I did not see a clean way to fix that in the article. We only have a hint that it was at ebb tide in the Salvage section which has "It has also been suggested that the currents may have pushed the ship out to sea as she sank" which is sourced to an article behind a paywall. It also would be WP:OR on our part to add to the article that explains the 320 vs. 287 feet the way I did on this talk thread.
I decided to get around the issue by updating the article body to say the ship sank in 287 of water. I suspect that'll work out as the 320 foot number was never sourced. --Marc Kupper|talk 04:19, 11 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The lede states Of the approximately 220 passengers and crew on board, fewer than 85 people survived the sinking, while 135 others were killed in the catastrophe, while the body reports slightly different totals, of the 210 people aboard, 82 were rescued and approximately 130 people lost their lives.. Since neither statement is cited properly, it's difficult to determine which numbers are correct. If accurate numbers can't be obtained, a note should be made to indicate the sources of error. Hadron137 (talk) 04:39, 20 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
