Talk:STANAG 6022

This article is within the scope of WikiProject NATO, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.NATOWikipedia:WikiProject NATOTemplate:WikiProject NATONATO articles

Military history: Technology Start‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Start

This article has been rated as Start-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion not met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military science, technology, and theory task force

Copyvio?[edit]

Possible source: http://infostore.saiglobal.com/store/Details.aspx?productID=463830 (requires registration to access whole document). Google search finds (for the above):

STANAG 6022 Ed. 1 (2005) Adoption Of A Standard Gridded Data ...

infostore.saiglobal.com/store/Details.aspx?productID... - Australia

28 Jun 2005 – STANAG 6022 Ed. 1 (2005) Adoption Of A Standard Gridded Data Meteorological Message Defines a meteorological message for gridded ... (no cached version available).

http://engineers.ihs.com/document/abstract/WQQOIBAAAAAAAAAA says: "The aim of this agreement is to define a meteorological message for gridded meteorological data and to standardise the number of information digits and their meanings for use by the Armed Forces of any country. This will make it possible for all Armed Forces to be able to receive gridded meteorological data for use with the NATO Artillery Ballistic Kernel (NABK) software, NBC Automated Warning, Reporting and Prediction Systems (NBC AWRAPS) and various computer-based Battlefield Decision Aids (BDAs)." (Note extremely close paraphrasing.) Pesky (talk …stalk!) 05:20, 8 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If the aim of the STANAG itself can't be used to describe the STANAG (through close paraphrasing), maybe something like this could be written: "STANAG 6022 is the latest step ref. http://nigelef.tripod.com/fc_meteor.htm in artillery meteorological messaging, which provides for gridded meteorological data. This means that instead of representing a single balloon ascent and local data, using such older STANAGs as 4082, it provides a grid of data in four dimensions – vertical, two horizontal and time that may be compiled from many data sources including improved forecasting. The basic area of coverage in, for example, the UK implementation is 60 km × 60 km, divided into cubes however the METGM can be set to varying sizes depending on needs. A particular benefit of this approach is that it provides data that is more representative of the trajectory and different data will be used can be used along the trajectory. However, the data is only available as a data file and this means that it can only be distributed through data communications with a means of transferring it to a fire control computer. Current release of the NATO Armaments Ballistic Kernel (NABK), can be used to compute trajectories using METGM. This four dimensional meteor grid using data from many sources removes the need for local data acquisition. It can also be used with gun locating radars to improve the accuracy of their results or in support of Chemical Biological, Radiological and Nuclear calculations for downwind hazards and plume prediction. Firepower Canada (talk) 12:12, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:NATO STANAGS and S4.png Nominated for speedy Deletion[edit]

An image used in this article, File:NATO STANAGS and S4.png, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations

What should I do?

Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 14:50, 8 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]