Talk:Sacco & Vanzetti (1971 film)

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Italian cinema task force.

Italy Low‑importance

	Italy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Italy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Italy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ItalyWikipedia:WikiProject ItalyTemplate:WikiProject ItalyItaly articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Anarchism

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anarchism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of anarchism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AnarchismWikipedia:WikiProject AnarchismTemplate:WikiProject Anarchismanarchism articles

Anarchism WikiProject open tasks
watch · edit · history · talk · purge

Recognized content · Drafts & requests · Member list · Resources · How can I help?

🚨🚨 Join our active cleanup drive for the month of May – all are invited 🚨🚨

Good article nominees

03 May 2024 – Mariano R. Vázquez (talk · edit · hist) was GA nominated by Grnrchst (t · c); start discussion
15 Apr 2024 – Anarchism without adjectives (talk · edit · hist) was GA nominated by Grnrchst (t · c); start discussion

Peer reviews

01 Mar 2024 – Gaetano Bresci (talk · edit · hist) has been put up for PR by Grnrchst (t · c); see discussion

Articles for creation

08 May 2024 – Draft:Cherepanov, Donat Andreevich (talk · edit · hist) has been submitted for AfC by Speedymagoo (t · c)
05 May 2024 – Draft:No Pasarán!: Antifascist Dispatches from a World in Crisis (talk · edit · hist) has been submitted for AfC by Fianticolonial (t · c)
undated – Draft:Grass Roots Books (talk · edit · hist) has been submitted for AfC
05 May 2024 – Draft:Mirna Wabi-Sabi (talk · edit · hist) submitted for AfC by Overlookedn (t · c) was deleted

Cleanup (350) · Potentially related articles · Recent edits · Recent Commons images · Stub expansion project (506)

Requested move 23 August 2015[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved to Sacco e Vanzetti (1971 film), '06 film moved to Sacco and Vanzetti (2006 film). Jenks24 (talk) 07:02, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

– I was going to propose "Sacco and Vanzetti (documentary film)" for the 2006 film, but I guess consistency by year is more suitable. ~~(EDIT: I found out many official English sources use ampersand for the 1971 film.)~~ See below. George Ho (talk) 00:39, 23 August 2015 (UTC) Relisted. Jenks24 (talk) 13:14, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support both for the English wiki.--Froglich (talk) 06:48, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Froglich: I can be wrong about usage on the 1971 film. --George Ho (talk) 17:03, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support both but not sure about the ampersand, if we are going to use the Italian, why muddle it? Pincrete (talk) 15:14, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Pincrete: How about Sacco e Vanzetti (1971 film) ([1][2][3][4]) or Sacco and Vanzetti (1971 film) ([5]? Sources use both per source: [6][7][8] Since usage is divided per WP:UE, you can pick whatever feels most comfortable to you. George Ho (talk) 17:00, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support either 'e' or 'and' … it is hard to see which is most used for the film (many of these examples are talking about the case). My feeling was that no one was going to type '&' in a search box. I don't know what policy is about the use of '&' in titles. Pincrete (talk) 17:19, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not a policy but a guideline: WP:& says that '&' can be used in article titles and proper nouns but must be normally avoided elsewhere. George Ho (talk) 17:24, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisting comment. Clear consensus to move, we just need to decide with of e/&/and to use for the 1971 film. Jenks24 (talk) 13:14, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
keep e, add (1971 film) In ictu oculi (talk) 20:10, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Expanded article[edit]

I've expanded this article, and deleted its stub status. Most of the new information for the expansion came from the German Wikipedia page Sacco und Vanzetti (film). I've followed the naming conventions agreed earlier on this page, so that

Sacco e Vanzetti is used for the film
Sacco and Vanzetti is used when talking about the characters
Sacco & Vanzetti is used in the external link to the iTunes page because that's what they're calling the film.

I'm still in the process of writing a 'Synopsis' section which I should hopefully have complete by the end of this week. Flourbomb (talk) 18:13, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]