This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Latin music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Latin music (music performed in Spanish, Portuguese and the languages of Ibero-America, see project scope for more details) on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Latin musicWikipedia:WikiProject Latin musicTemplate:WikiProject Latin musicLatin music articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Portugal, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Portugal on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PortugalWikipedia:WikiProject PortugalTemplate:WikiProject PortugalPortugal articles
Find correct name
The airport is not listed as João Paulo II anywhere.
The airport's own website calls itself simply Ponta Delgada, and has no mention of João Paulo.
Template:Regions of Portugal: statistical (NUTS3) subregions and intercommunal entities are confused; they are not the same in all regions, and should be sublisted separately in each region: intermunicipal entities are sometimes larger and split by subregions (e.g. the Metropolitan Area of Lisbon has two subregions), some intercommunal entities are containing only parts of subregions. All subregions should be listed explicitly and not assume they are only intermunicipal entities (which accessorily are not statistic subdivisions but real administrative entities, so they should be listed below, probably using a smaller font: we can safely eliminate the subgrouping by type of intermunicipal entity from this box).
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Eurovision, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Eurovision-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EurovisionWikipedia:WikiProject EurovisionTemplate:WikiProject EurovisionEurovision articles
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.
Please change "(...) with "Amar pelos dois", giving Portugal (...)" to "(...) with "Amar pelos dois", which directly translates to "Loving For the Two", giving Portugal (...)"
This request comes from witnessing the very horrid translation "For the Both of Us", in some articles like bbc, and the wish of giving proper information and translation to g
If you wish so, it's not that incorrect to add 'of Us' to the translation I provided, but it wouldn´t be such a direct translation. Thank you for your time Portugueseenglishspeaker (talk) 08:32, 14 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Wouldn't pelos dois be better translated "for both" in English? Awien (talk) 23:11, 14 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
"the both of us" is horrible, it's just "both of us". Awien (talk) 00:11, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
"The both" is correct, though I agree not very stylish. An emphatic version of "the two of us", one might say. Rothorpe (talk) 00:29, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Not done. This is an article about the singer, the translation should be discussed in the article about the song (See: Amar pelos dois). Vanjagenije(talk) 18:45, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Why is this article semi-protected? I don't see much "disruption" in the edit history. It just means that IPs like me can't make simple changes, like correcting the reference to the ca:Taller de Músics in Barcelona, and straightening out the mangled sentence that refers to his university studies. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.205.198.138 (talk) 08:53, 14 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The reason the article is semi-protected is because it has been featured in the news on the main page, not because of a turbulent edit-history. This prevents people from jumping to an article and making unchecked edits all at once. That way, editors who are better acquainted with the subject are able to make sure no vandalism slips through. The article's protection status will expire soon enough. — Tuxipεdia(talk) 05:32, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The current level of vandalism threats is at "elevated" (I have one of them widgets on my user page that informs me of this stuff). However, Tuxipedia is correct. When an article subject features on the WP:MAIN page, then they automatically get protected - merely to keep the integrity of Wikipedia intact. If you look for the small padlock icon at the top-right of the article, and hover your cursor over it, then it will show the reason for protection - if it were for disruption or vandalism. If no reason, but an expiry date, then it is mandatory protection due to mainpage prominence. WesWolfTalk 00:59, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
.svg){kind=small}
Not done. This is an article about the singer, the translation should be discussed in the article about the song (See: Amar pelos dois). Vanjagenije (talk) 18:45, 15 May 2017 (UTC)