Talk:Sansana

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

"judea and samaria"[edit]

We have established a set of naming conventions related to the usage of "Judea" and "Samaria". There is consensus that we cannot say that a place is in "Judea" or "Samaria" with certain exceptions. nableezy - 21:45, 18 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Category edit[edit]

Before I started adding this cat to pages that already included the subcats of "mixed" or "religious" settlements, I read through the H:CAT page and I didn't see any statement that a page shouldn't belong in both a subcat and the parent cat. To me it makes sense for the pages of the settlement to be listed in both, so that one cat might make a complete list of settlements. I'm happy to be proven otherwise if I'm not looking in the right place. TrickyH (talk) 21:56, 7 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A long time ago it was decided to file them away into the subcategories (I cannot remember why, nor even who by – it was probably around a decade ago). I suggest you should start a discussion at WP:Israel to discuss the matter with a wider forum. Number 57 16:50, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Is this the discussion you are referring to? Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Israel/Archive 1#Category:Israeli settlements - because if so, I can't actually see a consensus decision that contradicts what I've done there... maybe I'm not reading closely enough, it's very long.TrickyH (talk) 12:34, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
No, that's not the one. It may well be on an article talk page somewhere, or even someone's talk page. As I suggested, start a new discussion at WP:Israel. Cheers, Number 57 14:57, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]