Talk:Saudi Arabian Army/Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1

Royal Saudi Land Forces

Just did some more research on the structure and I kept coming up with the name "Royal Saudi Land Force" to describe the Saudi Army. Anyone have some thoughts on the validity of this, should we move this article to that name? It appears to match the other names for the air force and navy, "Royal Saudi Air Force" and "Royal Saudi Navy." Publicus 13:37, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

it's also known as (¹"Royal Saudi Land Force" Arabic: القوات البرية الملكية السعودية), but its much more popular with the name (²"Saudi Arabian Army" Arabic: الجيش العربي السعودي ) , i usually see this sign ² on saudi army vehicles and troops jackets . Ammar 13:52, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
Right on, just checking to make sure we had the right name. Thanks Ammar. Publicus 17:45, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
They both correct , don't worry :) Ammar 21:24, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

Graphic of the Army Structure

I'm currently working on a project to create graphics of the structure of the most important Armies. i.e. French Army; German Army; Italian Army I also want to make a graphic of the structure of the Saudi Arabian Army, but the information at this point is not sufficient, as there is no information what units compose the single brigades. Does anyone have this information- down to the Battalion names and/or numbers? Thanks noclador 07:44, 2 March 2007 (UTC)

User:Publicus has more information :) Ammar 08:07, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
I started to create the graphic with the data I found in the IISS Military Balance Report 2006 and the data that is in the Saudi Arabian Army article, but as I mentioned before much information is still missing: i.e. the names of the most Battalions are unknown, the units of the Aviation Brigades are unknown, and so on. I posted the unfinished graphic on this discussion board for now (see below) in the hope, that this will inspire someone to provide the missing information (see also: Saudi Arabian National Guard). Thank you very much in advance noclador 08:18, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
The unfinished graphic (click to enlarge)
can you post a larger copy than this ? its very unclear Ammar (Talk - Don't Talk) 13:15, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
Larger?? The graphic is at the moment 3525×1148 pixels... have you tried to click on it two times? First click brings you to the commons page and then a second click should bring you to the full sized image- or if this doesn't work: here is the direct link of the fullsized image in the commons: http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/6/65/Saudi_Army.png noclador 14:44, 7 May 2007 (UTC)


I posted the graphic now into the article, hoping that this will bring forth someone, with more information regarding the names of the units. noclador 05:05, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Saudi armyshow3.JPG

Image:Saudi armyshow3.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 22:03, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Saudi armyshow2.JPG

Image:Saudi armyshow2.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 22:03, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Saudi armyshow.JPG

Image:Saudi armyshow.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 22:03, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Sa army flag.JPG

Image:Sa army flag.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 22:54, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

MBT 2000

Saudi Arabia evaluated the MBT 2000 in the month of April 2006 to decide, if it would be acquired for the Saudi army. but further information regarding the acquisition of the MBT 2000 can not be found online - neither through google or on janes defence weekly- the follwoing article of Janes Defence Weekly is the last offical document i could find about the possibilty of the acquisition of the MBT 2000: http://www.janes.com/defence/news/jdw/jdw060313_1_n.shtml noclador 20:55, 15 March 2007 (UTC)

Good source :) Ammar 21:01, 15 March 2007 (UTC)

Till u find a source that confirms the sale, that part is a non-confirmed information that neither the saudi nor the pakistani governments have confirmed. just like the Egyptian evaluation of the M-60 2000 or 120S whcih is supposed to be either bought or belicensed produced, but no confirmation of that the project has taked place. —Preceding unsigned comment added by One last pharaoh (talkcontribs) 17:17, 7 December 2007 (UTC)

Format

The references and external links list is missing, even though I see them listed in the source of the article. Is this because of my browser (Firefox) or some other format issue? 24.193.28.27 (talk) 16:45, 19 July 2008 (UTC)

Never mind, fixed it. 24.193.28.27 (talk) 16:49, 19 July 2008 (UTC)

infantry weapons

infantry weapons of the saudi army use G3 G36C MP5 M4 AUG AK-47 and RPG-7 Rockets source are the links bellow they are some pics i found and can some 1 plz put them for me cuz i dont know how to put stuff in the article

http://www.hkpro.com/forum/chefs-corner-hk-action-series-continues/70862-saudi-soldiers-w-g3.html

http://www.qwled.com/vb/t122972.html

http://www.militaryphotos.net/forums/showthread.php?143839-Saudi-Arabia-using-Heckler-amp-Koch-G36-HK416-HK417/page2

http://www.militaryphotos.net/forums/showthread.php?134263-Saudi-Army-(K.S.A)-quot-Pictures-quot

http://www.allvoices.com/contributed-news/8565322/image/70671789-saudi-special-forces-take-part-in-a-military-parade — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.152.166.54 (talk) 21:17, 31 July 2011 (UTC)

Unfortunately forums and self published sources are not considered WP:RELIABLE. (Hohum @) 21:40, 31 July 2011 (UTC)

History

The Saudi Army was created in 1923. Fine. But what is the relevance of a meeting between "King Abdulaziz and the American President Franklin D. Roosevelt on February 14, 1945"? This has nothing to do with the history of the army. Incidentally, the Americans did not "became the new major ally of Saudi Arabia" in 1945. America had little influence or involvement in Saudi Arabia.203.184.41.226 (talk) 01:37, 21 September 2013 (UTC)

More realistic list about the equipment

Numbers about equipment are too inflated there is a More realistic list http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/gulf/rslf-equipment.htm --Pototo1 (talk) 20:54, 25 September 2014 (UTC)

Tank battalions

Supposedly there are three armoured and five mechanized brigades, the former with three and the latter with one tank battalion each. That is 14 battalions. If there are 42 tanks per battalion, as claimed, that is 588 tanks. Plus additional tanks in training units and depots. Yet there are only 442 M1 in service. Either there are more tanks, or less battalions.Royalcourtier (talk) 04:16, 16 January 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Saudi Arabian Army. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 20:01, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 02:22, 18 March 2019 (UTC)