Talk:Sawmill Fire (2017)/GA1
GA Review[edit]
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: GhostRiver (talk · contribs) 21:59, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
I'll be taking a look at this article! — GhostRiver 21:59, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
Good Article review progress box
|
Infobox and lede[edit]
- "and then to extinguish"
- "Footage of the fire's inception was released by the U.S. Forest Service at the request of a local news agency in November 2018, resulting in its causation being mocked online." → "When the U.S. Forest Service released footage of the fire's inception in November 2018 at the request of a local news agency, the cause of the Sawmill Fire was subject to online mockery."
Cause[edit]
- To clarify, is the property owned by the state of Arizona, or by Arizona State University? If the former, as I suspect, then I would suggest saying "a state-owned property in south-central Arizona"
- "but was unable to because of the speed at which it was spreading." → "but the speed at which it spread rendered his attempts unsuccessful."
Fire[edit]
- "and precipitation was abnormally low for the region"
- "and had been closed on April 24" → "and had been closed earlier that day"
- "repairs to the road, meanwhile, lasted until early May"
- "Wind as high as 45 miles per hour (72 km/h) was expected" → "Winds as high as 45 miles per hour (72 km/h) were expected"
- "by 30 April" → "by April 30"
Aftermath[edit]
- WL U.S. Attorney's Office
- Added –♠Vami_IV†♠ 04:16, 3 September 2021 (UTC)
- "though the fire started on property of the State of Arizona, Federal property had been burned." → "although the fire started on property of the State of Arizona, federal property had also been burned."
- "and was summoned to appear"
- "on 29 September" → "on September 29"
- "in Dickey and gender reveal parties in general" → "in both Dickey and the concept of gender reveal parties"
- I would say "the first wildfire known to be ignited by a gender reveal party"
- "igniting more public outrage" → "which ignited more public outrage"
References[edit]
- "azcentral" → "The Arizona Republic" with WL in [16] and [43]
- Add "|url-access=limited" parameter to NYT (3), WaPo (39), and Forbes (42)
General comments[edit]
- No stability concerns are present in the revision history
- One picture (map) that is in the public domain and is relevant to the article
- Earwig score is good at 9.9%
Putting on hold now, ping me if there are any questions. — GhostRiver 23:25, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
- @GhostRiver: Addressed the above. I've since writing the article acquired some more materials for #Aftermath about, well, the aftermath of the fire. Should I add them in now or would you like for me to refrain for now, and keep this review short? –♠Vami_IV†♠ 04:22, 3 September 2021 (UTC)
- @Vami IV: The article is is short enough that I wouldn't mind if you added them in and then I can take a quick look! — GhostRiver 13:35, 3 September 2021 (UTC)
- @GhostRiver: OK, done, and all in one revision. –♠Vami_IV†♠ 03:38, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
- @Vami IV: The article is is short enough that I wouldn't mind if you added them in and then I can take a quick look! — GhostRiver 13:35, 3 September 2021 (UTC)