Talk:Semantic dyslexia

	Psychology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Dyslexia (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Dyslexia, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.DyslexiaWikipedia:WikiProject DyslexiaTemplate:WikiProject DyslexiaDyslexia articles

Disability

Semantic dyslexia is within the scope of WikiProject Disability. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.DisabilityWikipedia:WikiProject DisabilityTemplate:WikiProject DisabilityDisability articles

PSY Assignment[edit]

I think the limited information added to this article was an excellent start, however it is not nearly enough information on the topic of Semantic Dyslexia.--Baldanza92 (talk) 23:51, 4 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

General[edit]

The term "semantic dyslexia" is a strange term that does not appear to come from any scientific sources. I believe whoever wrote this is confusing it with the term "deep dyslexia", which is a subtype of Alexia (reading loss due to brain damage) and has no relationship to what is being described here. I would suggest either removing this topic altogether, or simply creating a redirect to Alexia.

--Drmarc 22:01, 2 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

In the recent neurolinguistic approach there are four different alexic syndromes which may occur with an aphasia. These four subtypes of alexia have been called Phonological, Deep, Surface, and Semantic, which occur due different types of failure in the neurolinguistic model of normal reading dolfrog (talk) 13:49, 15 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Edits Psy 101[edit]

Well it was defiantly a good start but your statements weren't cited. For example when you used the bus situation you didn't cite your source and that could become problematic. When making correction you need revise your previous statements and add citations to the information that you used. Keep up the good work (: AlexisBPorter (talk) 02:03, 10 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You did really good! there were no spelling errors, copying, or close paraphrasing. I didnt eve have to edit it but you need to work on citing it better. thats primarley your main issue. But other than that good work. User:BBWiki11 --BBWiki11 (talk) 04:43, 10 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Ambassador Program course assignment[edit]

This article is the subject of an educational assignment at St. Charles Community College supported by WikiProject Psychology and the Wikipedia Ambassador Program during the 2011 Q3 term. Further details are available on the course page.

The above message was substituted from {{WAP assignment}} by PrimeBOT (talk) on 16:01, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]