Talk:Serbian Party Oathkeepers
Serbian Party Oathkeepers has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: March 22, 2024. (Reviewed version). |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Serbian Party Oathkeepers article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1 |
This page is not a forum for general discussion about Serbian Party Oathkeepers. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Serbian Party Oathkeepers at the Reference desk. |
This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
While the biographies of living persons policy does not apply directly to the subject of this article, it may contain material that relates to living persons, such as friends and family of persons no longer living, or living persons involved in the subject matter. Unsourced or poorly sourced contentious material about living persons must be removed immediately. If such material is re-inserted repeatedly, or if there are other concerns related to this policy, please see this noticeboard. |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org |
GA Review[edit]
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Serbian Party Oathkeepers/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: PizzaKing13 (talk · contribs) 00:10, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
I'll go ahead and review this article. PizzaKing13 ¡Hablame! 00:10, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
Infobox[edit]
- Looks good
Lead[edit]
- "commonly just known as" → "commonly known as simply" or "just"
- Done
- "Initially, an association known as Serbian Council Oathkeepers, SSZ was formed [...]" → "Initially known as Serbian Council Oathkeepers, SSZ was formed [...]"
- Done
- Is there any chance that Stefan Stamenkovski is notable enough to get an article in the future? if so, leave a red link there WP:REDYES
- Done
- mention that Republika Srpska is an entity within Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Done
- "supports changing Serbia's immigration system", in what regard?
- Done Changed it to "restricting"
- Replace "It" in the last sentence of the lead with "SSZ" to break a series of "it"s at the end of the 3rd paragraph
- Done
History[edit]
- 2012–2014
- Remove the "(Sretenje)" translation of Presentation of Jesus
- Done
- Remove "also known in Serbian as Kosovski zavet", and mention what Kosovo Myth is
- Done
- "A day after the formation" → "A day after SSZ's formation"
- Done
- "organised by SSZ and organisations": add "far-right" between "and" and "organisations" since all those listed are described as far-right on their Wikipedia pages
- Done
- Mention what the Brussels Agreement was
- Done
- 2015–2017
- Any specific reason that SSZ protested the commemoration of the Srebrenica massacre?
- Done
- Any specific reason that SSZ rallied to support Ratko Mladić?
- Done
- 2018–2020
- What does "Mirëdita, dobar dan!" mean, translate it in the interlanguage link
- Done
- The prose says the party was registered on 14 June 2019 while the infobox says it was 14 August 2019, which is it?
- Done August
- Also, possibly important or may be irrelevant, what's the difference between being a registered party and not being registered in Serbia, since it seems that the party was able to participate in elections before registration and it doesn't seem to me that anything was different afterwards.
- Citizens groups or associations do not hold the same legal rights as political parties.
- Does Republic Electoral Commission link to anything? on Serbian Wikipedia? red link per WP:REDYES?
- Done
- Who is Zoran Zečević (occupation)?
- Done Linked
- "SSZ did not cross the 3 percent electoral threshold", in order to gain representation in parliament?
- Done
- 2021–present
- Why did SSZ refuse to join the government coalition?
- Done
- Specify that Miloš Ković is at the Faculty of Philosophy of the *University of Belgrade*
- Done
- Mention somewhere that Đurđević became the party's president in 2021
- Done
Ideology and platform[edit]
- Specify Dušan Spasojević is at the Faculty of Political Sciences of the University of Belgrade
- Done
- "introduction of law alike the" → "a law alike" or "laws alike"
- Done
- Specify what "Europe of Nations" is
- Done
- Mention Darya Dugina's occupation
- Done
- "has been committed on Bosniaks" → "had been committed on Bosniaks"
- Done
Organisation[edit]
- No CC or PD image of Stefan Stamenkovski?
- Nope
Electoral performance[edit]
- References needed for 2023 performances
- Done
References[edit]
- References seem to be reliable/scholarly
- Add the Politics portal to the portal template
- Done
Images[edit]
- File:Serbian Party Oathkeepers logo.svg – fair use
- File:Milica Đurđević Stamenkovski 2022.png – cc 3.0
- File:Milica Đurđević Stamenkovski and Boško Obradović at RIK, 4 November 2023.png – cc 3.0
- Licenses seem to be fine PizzaKing13 ¡Hablame! 00:18, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
Overall[edit]
- No war edits/stable
- Broad and focused on topic
- Neutral
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a. (reference section):
- b. (citations to reliable sources):
- c. (OR):
- d. (copyvio and plagiarism):
- a. (reference section):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a. (major aspects):
- b. (focused):
- a. (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):
- b. (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/fail:
- Pass/fail:
(Criteria marked are unassessed)
@Vacant0: I've left comments for the GAN. PizzaKing13 ¡Hablame! 01:19, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
- I'll take a look at this tomorrow. Vacant0 (talk) 19:46, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
- OK, I was busy, I'll start working on this today. Vacant0 (talk) 12:46, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
- @PizzaKing13: All done. Vacant0 (talk) 19:45, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
- Hello @PizzaKing13, could you take a look and promote the article? Vacant0 (talk) 15:56, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
- @Vacant0: Sorry for the delay. Everything looks good to me. I'll pass this review. PizzaKing13 ¡Hablame! 19:39, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
- Hello @PizzaKing13, could you take a look and promote the article? Vacant0 (talk) 15:56, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
- @PizzaKing13: All done. Vacant0 (talk) 19:45, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
- OK, I was busy, I'll start working on this today. Vacant0 (talk) 12:46, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Categories:
- Wikipedia good articles
- Social sciences and society good articles
- Wikipedia articles that use British English
- GA-Class Serbia articles
- Low-importance Serbia articles
- WikiProject Serbia articles
- GA-Class politics articles
- Low-importance politics articles
- GA-Class political party articles
- Low-importance political party articles
- Political parties task force articles
- WikiProject Politics articles
- GA-Class Conservatism articles
- Low-importance Conservatism articles
- WikiProject Conservatism articles