Talk:Shackleford (horse)/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer:Dr. Blofeld 11:07, 7 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Starting read through.♦ Dr. Blofeld 11:07, 7 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Lead
  • "His pedigree traces to major sires of significance. " Could you perhaps mention some of his most famous sires after this?
Three year old season
  • What exactly is the XpressBet Consolation Bonus? How does it work? Should this be wiki-linked with an article?
  • "Down the backstretch the leaders slowed the pace down as both moved around the track together, clocking 3⁄4-mile (1,200 m) in 1:12 flat." -citation needed.
  • What is meant by "on a sloppy track. " -Poor quality, slippery/soggy or what? Please reword.
Pedigree
Pedigree of Shackleford table
Sources

Can you ref the earnings of $1,701,666 in the infobox?♦ Dr. Blofeld 15:48, 7 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:
    B. MoS compliance:
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
    C. No original research:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    B. Focused:
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:

Seems to meet all of the requirements for GA. Considering the short "career" of the horse to date it is satisfactory, but you'll need to update it regularly in the coming seasons. I doubt it could ever become a featured article, at least not the the near future. The prose could still do with a little work in places as some of the sentences can be quite hard to read. A little too much reliance on Equibase.com also. Overall not bad though.♦ Dr. Blofeld 17:27, 7 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]