This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This page is about an active politician who is running for office or has recently run for office, is in office and campaigning for re-election, or is involved in some current political conflict or controversy. Because of this, this article is at increased risk of biased editing, talk-page trolling, and simple vandalism.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Socialism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of socialism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SocialismWikipedia:WikiProject SocialismTemplate:WikiProject Socialismsocialism articles
It might be premature, but would a "Criticism" section regarding things like the difficulty filling Defence (which I do have a sourced quote of Bryant denying the role, certainly not accepting, though what is our position on the journalists who wrote articles on overhearing the process??), Creasy denying the Youth role given to De Piero (who also apparently declined Defence along with Powell, who had wanted Education), "doing a Mandelson" with Eagle to stick a women at the top alongside the response to McDonnell getting Shadow Chancellor over her and the amount of London MPs, never mind about policy, be something we could do? Therequiembellishere (talk)
we don't need to be a newspaper or a political gossip column. Are these points really things that are encyclopedic and are likely to merit inclusion looking back after a decent period of time when the cabinet has actually had a chance to do some things? JMiall₰ 04:00, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Agree with User:JMiall here, especially as some of the "criticism" was sourced from the Daily Mail. If any seriously notable criticism exists, please clarify what it is. Does not seem to be an unfair amount of London MP's though. AusLondonder (talk) 04:18, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I don't really understand why AusLondonder keeps bringing up the Daily Mail as if it's my only source. Literally every news source has covered these critiques, most of which is from within Labour itself as it has seldom been seen before, especially for a new leader. I'll take JMiall's point that much of it is likely to blow over (however interesting it may be), but I'm a little peeved that I seem to be coming off as some Mail reader because I used it as a source once for what was frankly a well made (though condescending) chart detailing the shuffle from Harman to Corbyn's cabinets. Honestly, pick up a paper and you'll see each and everyone one of the points I raised mentioned. Therequiembellishere (talk) 07:49, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
OK, but what is the specific criticism that needs mentioning? AusLondonder (talk) 18:12, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The Telegraph has a full list of the 60 frontbench resignations so far, just in case it needs referencing somewhere. The article itself is unrelated, I just saw the list at the bottom and thought it'd be worth saving somewhere. [1]Therequiembellishere (talk) 05:44, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This template needs updating - all we need are the currents members in the template not all the previous members, those details can and are mentioned in the article. Govindaharihari (talk) 07:02, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The Shadow Cabinet of Jeremy Corbyn is the current Official Opposition Shadow Cabinet of the United Kingdom; is there any particular reason why the exact same entity should have two separate pages?2A00:23C4:4F07:1000:51ED:B111:9877:ABB1 (talk) 19:07, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Because the official shadow cabinet changes from time to time and this article incorporates those changes, whereas the other one doesn't, and reflects only the current position. Remember also that Corbyn won't always be leader of the opposition. This is Paul (talk) 19:23, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
.svg){kind=small}
