Talk:Shah Mahmood Qureshi
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article has been mentioned by multiple media organizations:
|
A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion[edit]
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 13:51, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
Allegations of antisemitism subjection[edit]
I have noticed a lot of reversals of the allegations of antisemitism subsection based on the belief that the journalist conducting the interview was biased. Regardless of the veracity of the accusations of bias I would argue that this subsection should remain online as it is. The interview was undeniably an important episode of Minister Qureshi’s life and it is described in a largely neutral tone (says that it was condemned as antisemitic rather than outright declaring it as such and includes that Qureshi denied the accusation). Even if the journalist was biased, I believe that the situation was described accurately and with a neutral voice. If you want to be completely fair to Qureshi I would have no problem including a more detailed description of his defence, however to delete the subsection entirely is irresponsible. Let me know what you think I am open to other opinions. Hawkystar (talk) 03:51, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
- This is simply to thank you for a very reasonable summary of the state of play. It is distressing to see anonymous editors engaging in edit-warring and other vandalistic behavior. As the original author of this section, I just want to reiterate that I, too, would be happy to discuss other perspectives on this section, but bulk deletion of material is not appropriate. --Publius In The 21st Century (talk) 20:40, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
- Biography articles of living people
- Start-Class biography articles
- Start-Class biography (politics and government) articles
- Low-importance biography (politics and government) articles
- Politics and government work group articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- Start-Class Pakistan articles
- Unknown-importance Pakistan articles
- WikiProject Pakistan articles
- Wikipedia pages referenced by the press