Talk:Shake It Off (Mariah Carey song)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Calvin • ^NaNaNaC'mon! 19:30, 3 August 2011 (UTC) Will begin shortly.

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it well written?

   A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:

   B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:

2. Is it verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check?

   A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:

   B. Reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose):

   C. It contains no original research:

   D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:

   B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):

4. Is it neutral?

   It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:

5. Is it stable?

   It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:

6. Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?

   A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:

   B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

• Info box

1. No issues

• Lead info

1. No issues.

• Background

1. No issues.

• Recording and development

1. No issues.

• Composition

1. (Vocal range is wrong, I can't help but point it out! lol)
2. No other issues.

• Reception - Critical Repception

1. No issues.

• Reception - Chart performance

1. No issues.

• Remix

1. No issues, this is going well!

• Music video - Background

1. "previous two video.[47]" → "videos", not "video". I spoke too soon :/ lol.
2. "had to very high-heeled pumps," → "had to wear very high-heeled pumps" ?

• Music video - Synopsis

1. No issues

• Music video - Reception

1. No issues

• Live performances

1. "New Years Eve celebration, featured "It's Like That", "We Belong Together"," → If you are going to link, then you should link It's Like That and WBT in the couple of sentences before, not here.

• Formats and track listings

1. No issues.

• Credits and personnel

1. No issues.

• Charts and certifications

1. No issues.

• Release history

1. Isn't there any info for the release dates for radio, digital downloads, CDs?

   Its hard, because all those sources will list only the date Mimi was released, as the single was released far later :S--CallMeNathan • Talk2Me 23:44, 9 August 2011 (UTC)

   I'm pretty sure if you looked on the iTunes store website, it would tell you when it was released, you could do that for multiple iTunes stores countries. Calvin • ^NaNaNaC'mon! 23:46, 9 August 2011 (UTC)

   I looked, and I said, no good.--CallMeNathan • Talk2Me 04:09, 10 August 2011 (UTC)

• References

1. No problematic links

I'd say this is your most thorough and articulate article to date that I have reviewed to date, only 3 things to address! On hold. Calvin • ^NaNaNaC'mon!

Passed Calvin • ^NaNaNaC'mon! 11:46, 10 August 2011 (UTC)