Talk:Shapes of Things/GA1
GA Review[edit]
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Ritchie333 (talk · contribs) 11:30, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
Happy to review this.
Lead[edit]
- "in late 1965 and early 1966" - this is confusing. I think it would be simpler to say when the song was released in the lead (ie: February 1966), and go in to depth about the recording in the body
- The Richie Unterberger quotation needs to be duplicated in the body
- "The song became a feature of live Yardbirds performances" - the problem with the body is that although it indirectly mentions this in terms of other live releases of the song, there's no obvious corresponding part of the body that explains how the song fit into the group's live performances, particularly how it coped with personnel changes.
Writing and recording[edit]
- "Bassist/music director Paul Samwell-Smith" - is he normally known as a "music director"? He went on to become a producer, but I don't think his role was as significant as it later became.
- "are usually credited with writing the song." - don't need "usually", unless the writing credit has been challenged in court (eg: per A Whiter Shade of Pale) that is what it is
- The block quotation would sit better as prose, and trimmed down a bit to avoid close paraphrasing
- "Keith Relf" in the last sentence should just be "Relf" per WP:LASTNAME
- "multi-tracking" : link to multitrack recording
Lyrics and instrumentation[edit]
- ""Shapes of Things" marked the beginning of the Yardbirds recording only original songs, until the departure of Jeff Beck at the end of 1966" - does this imply they went back to recording covers after Beck's departure? I think this sentence is a bit confusing - it might be simpler to say ""Shapes of Things" was the first single that had been written by band members"
- "Their five previous record chart hits" can simply be expressed as "Previous singles"
- "a Brian and Mike Hugg composition" - who is Brian?
- "composition, which the Yardbirds recorded in September 1965 for their second American album Having a Rave Up." => "composition on their second US album, Having a Rave Up
- The song lyrics should be removed, as they don't really add anything to the prose, and are technically a copyright violation. However, the Metrolyrics reference should still be retained as an external link
- Trimmed lyrics, but retained two pertinent lines to illustrate the ambiguity. This qualifies as fair use under copyright law (see WP:SONG#LYRICS). —Ojorojo (talk) 18:06, 8 August 2014 (UTC)
- "known as a "rave-up" - quotation needs a source
- "Drummer Jim McCarty established a marching-style beat with a walking bass-line" - this section is difficult to parse, particularly if you don't know anything about the Yardbirds. I think this section goes into a bit too much detail. If the sources talk about the guitar solo and the "psychedelic" style the most, that's what the article should give due weight to.
Releases and chart performance[edit]
- "Shapes of Things" was previewed in 12 February 1966 issue of The Beat, which commented" - How about "The first mention of the single was in February 1966, when The Beat said"
- "on 25 February 1966" - don't need "1966", the earlier prose makes it obvious which year we're talking about (same applies further down)
- "In the UK, it was paired with" - may be simpler to say "the B-side was" rather than "paired with"
- "peaked at number eleven" - numbers are being used elsewhere in this section, use "11". The footnote on this sentence is unsourced and it doesn't seem obvious how it relates to this song
- "The song had its first album release in the UK in 1966 on the various artists compilation Go, Vol. 1 (16 September 1966 Columbia SX 6062)" - "The song's first appearance on an album was on Go, Vol. 1 in September 1966"
- "In the US in 1967" - don't need "in 1967"
- "which was their highest charting" - don't need "which was"
- "Also in 1971" - don't need "Also" - the previous paragraph was talking about general reissues
- "with the Jimmy Page line-up" - with Jimmy Page on guitar
- "Relf prefaced the song by announcing" - "Relf announced the song saying". The quotation following it is unsourced
- "It is likely that..." - this sentence, and its footnote, look like unsourced original research and should be removed
- "bootleg" can wikilink to bootleg recording
- "Several live versions have appeared on various" - this sentence, and its footnotes, are unsourced
Jeff Beck Group version[edit]
- "Jeff Beck reworked" - "Beck re-recorded"
- "its aggressive, heavily-amplified sound, set the tone for the album" - set the tone according to whom?
Recognition and influence[edit]
- What position is the song on the Rock n Roll Hall of Fame list
- The #61 position on Q Magazine's list is unsourced
- "It was also noted that "Shapes of Things" - "it was noted" is a word to watch, and Ian McDonald's Revolution in the Head (my go to Beatles source) says nothing about the guitar solo being an influence on Taxman. I think this sentence should probably go.
- The sentence referring to Led Zeppelin is too specific. It would simpler to say that the group occasionally played a portion of it live in concert
- The AllMusic source citing list of other artists covering the song should go at the end of the sentence. Also, this section could be fleshed out a little - the Black Crowes with Jimmy Page version is probably significant given Page's association with the Yardbirds.
Images[edit]
- I'm not sure we need the record label image - it's non free and doesn't really give us any more information than what we can read in the prose. I would use the European picture sleeve cover instead.
Summary[edit]
- There's a bit of work to do here to meet the GA criteria, but nothing insurmountable, so I'll put it on hold for a week pending improvements. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 11:30, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks for taking this on. I plan to work on it a bit at a time, but should have it finished within your timeframe. —Ojorojo (talk) 17:11, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
- Ritchie333, I've shifted the focus a bit and moved some things around. I think it's ready for another look. —Ojorojo (talk) 14:57, 9 August 2014 (UTC)
- Okay, that looks good. I'll have a read through everything and see if there's anything else that needs to be done, then we'll be good to go. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 09:02, 10 August 2014 (UTC)
- Ritchie333, I've shifted the focus a bit and moved some things around. I think it's ready for another look. —Ojorojo (talk) 14:57, 9 August 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks for taking this on. I plan to work on it a bit at a time, but should have it finished within your timeframe. —Ojorojo (talk) 17:11, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
Additional comments[edit]
- The reference "McCarty 2010" does not exist in the reference list and is missing a page number
- The reference "di Perna 2012" has the same problem as above
- The reference "Unterberger Biography" does not exist
- The reference "Unterberger Birdland" does not exist
- The reference "Eder Truth" does not exist
- The reference "Erlewine" does not exist
To test references, hover your mouse over the footnote and you should get a link. Click on this link and you will be directed to the relevant entry in the "Notes" or "References" section. The above references do not work this way. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 09:21, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
- These are online sources, so I changed the ref format. Also, I think it is important to include that Beck's use of feedback is musical, and not just an effect (like Red Crayola or Hendrix's "EXP"). And that the lyrics are ambiguous (the reader can decide). BTW, these are direct quotes, not paraphrased. —Ojorojo (talk) 15:06, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
- The problem is that if a quotation is too long, it can be perceived as being a copyright violation, although how much is "too long" is open to question and interpretation. Anyway, I've done a few more fixes, and I can't think of anything else left to cover, so I can now pass the article. Good work. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 15:32, 11 August 2014 (UTC)