This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project, participate in relevant discussions, and see lists of open tasks. Current time in Japan: 11:58, May 25, 2024 (JST, Reiwa 6) (Refresh)JapanWikipedia:WikiProject JapanTemplate:WikiProject JapanJapan-related articles
The "etymology" section is weird; "shinbashira" is an ordinary example of rendaku and doesn't need to be explained here
The whole article is about pillars in Japan, but the first picture is from a Chinese pagoda and has a Chinese caption
In the "Earthquake resistance" section, the italics in the first paragraph are a lengthy quote from the Economist but not marked as such, though the article is given as a citation.
Some portions of the article are taken directly from here and not marked as a quote or even italicized, it's just given as a citation.
Japanese Wiki doesn't have an article on architectural shinbashira - a note at the top of 真柱 just redirects to 仏塔, the article on pagodas. Perhaps it would be better to merge this into Tō? --Polm23 (talk) 06:41, 28 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]