Talk:Shivalli Brahmins

Language correction

Just a small correstion. Words like upanayana and sagothra are not words from tulu but are from sanskrit. Isn't it appropriate to state that —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.163.25.48 (talk • contribs) 05:58, 30 March 2007

Copyright problem removed

One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s). The History section was copied verbatim from: http://www.kakkilaya.com/shiva1.html. I removed the infringing material, and it must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. The source has a copyright notice that reserves "all rights". (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. —Finell 05:17, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

Unsourced statement

Someone put this statement, "It is currently thought that the lowly role amongst the latter was due to an attempt at maintaining line purity by the first Shivali Brahmin men who migrated to the South and married local (non-Brahmin) fisher women." Generally, in most traditional Brahmin societies, women's roles in religion were limited. So there is no reference supporting this statement. So I have removed the statement. Raj2004 (talk) 23:35, 2 January 2010 (UTC)

Are the Shivalli Deshasthas?

We would like to use the Upanayanam picture in this article for Deshastha Brahmin. But the picture is not admissible unless we prove it's a Deshastha boy's upanayanam. Can you confirm or deny that the Shivalli Brahmins are Deshastha like the Madhva Brahmins from North Karnataka? Thanks. Zuggernaut (talk) 05:49, 19 August 2010 (UTC)

no they are not.11:28, 22 February 2012 (UTC)

File:Sri sir Vishwesha Theertha Swamiji.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

	An image used in this article, File:Sri sir Vishwesha Theertha Swamiji.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations What should I do?
	Speedy deletions at commons tend to take longer than they do on Wikipedia, so there is no rush to respond. If you feel the deletion can be contested then please do so (commons:COM:SPEEDY has further information). Otherwise consider finding a replacement image before deletion occurs. This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 16:12, 18 June 2011 (UTC)

Truth about shivallis

"It is currently thought that the lowly role amongst the latter was due to an attempt at maintaining line purity by the first Shivali Brahmin men who migrated to the South and married local (non-Brahmin) fisher women." This statement is the real fact  and shivallis are really born in this way from moger/marakalas/fisherwoman and also other caste woman.So they are having kulanamas like baris of shoodras with names ending with aaya,naaya ,thaaya, laaya.e.g shoodra name paduvannaya is also there in shivallis.See the similarities like kotiyannaya became kotian ,saliyannaya became saliyan similarly this kulanamas. It indicates from where and which caste we shivallis married for the first time. Refer Tulunadu for this. There was no need of removing the statement-- shreesha kedilaya  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shivashambo (talk • contribs) 05:58, 9 June 2016 (UTC) 

Fisher woman reference

I removed this statement "On the fourth day there is a symbolic representation of fish catching in brides house to represent the actual origins of shivalli women from mogers (i.e. fisherwoman)and other castes.. " There is no academic reference supporting this statement.Raj2004 (talk) 22:50, 12 May 2018 (UTC)

References

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Shivalli Brahmins. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160114022217/http://www.deccanchronicle.com/bengaluru/upper-caste-families-look-other-communities-945 to http://www.deccanchronicle.com/bengaluru/upper-caste-families-look-other-communities-945

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:44, 1 December 2016 (UTC)