Talk:Sholapith

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject West Bengal (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article was last assessed in April 2012.

Plants Mid‑importance

	Plants portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of plants and botany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PlantsWikipedia:WikiProject PlantsTemplate:WikiProject Plantsplant articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Sholapith. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20131208003607/http://www.aboutbengal.com:80/2009/02/shola_pith_craft_west_bengal to http://aboutbengal.com/2009/02/shola_pith_craft_west_bengal/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 17:05, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

What part of the plant, exactly?[edit]

The first major paragraph says "The useful part of this plant is the bark of the wood (secondary-xylem) of the stem. This wood is often mistaken as the pith" which seems to say that the bark is the used part of the plant. Then it says "The sholapith is the cortex or core of the plant and is about 1.5 inch across" which makes is sound as if the core of the plant is 1.5 inches and is the used part of the plant, which contradicts the first sentence. Then the caption says "The central, dark hollow tube contained the pith which disappeared with the ageing of the plant" which seems to say that the central core of the plant is small, which seems to contradict the second sentence.

Can anyone provide some clarity about what part of the plat is actually used, and clean up those sentences? Thanks! Chconnor (talk) 07:04, 13 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know but I just wanted to confirm that I was similarly puzzled. Ccrrccrr (talk) 11:58, 13 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Number punctuation question[edit]

Is the punctuation for 1,10,000-1,20,000 correct? I don't think I'm familiar with the pattern. Fanccr (talk) 00:35, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Polystyrene[edit]

Removed the comparison. Ref broken but way-back machine has it here [[1]] Ref does not support the text. Springnuts (talk) 18:26, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]