Talk:Shorshe ilish

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Place of origin[edit]

I have changed the "place of origin" to Bengal since this dish clearly predates the division of Bengal. Similarly I have changed the "Bengali" link in the first sentence and made it point to Bengali cuisine. The articles on specifically Indian and Bangladeshi cuisines are still mentioned in the "See also" section. Huon (talk) 22:48, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have again changed the origin to "Bengali", there are plenty of sources discussing West Bengali shorshe ilish and, as far as I can tell, none that say it's only or primarily popular with Bangladeshi immigrants. While I was at it, I also changed the spelling to "shorshe ilish": That's what the sources use, unanimously. Huon (talk) 11:37, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pure vandalism by User:Za-ari-masen[edit]

@Utcursch, BD2412, and Huon:, please look at this non-sense by @Za-ari-masen:, Bengali is not a nation, it is an ethnicity. But, they keep putting Bengali as a nation, which it is not. This is pure jingoistic nonsense, which is unaccpetable. (96.240.28.30 (talk) 05:29, 10 February 2020 (UTC))[reply]

I have no knowledge of the topic, and therefore can not comment one way or the other. Cheers! BD2412 T 05:32, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This is a possible sock IP of a blocked user. I was rather reverting to the version stored by Huon for his neutral stance which the IP reverted and now they have accused me of jingoism and complaining to Huon himself. Za-ari-masen (talk) 05:43, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The issue is Bengali is not a "nationality", it is an ethnicity. You revision is not correct. Bangladesh and India are national cusines, but Bengal is a region. (96.240.28.30 (talk) 05:48, 10 February 2020 (UTC))[reply]
That is a pure personal attack, everytime you have an opposition, you state they are a sock. However, it turns out to be rubbish, as seen here. (96.240.28.30 (talk) 05:50, 10 February 2020 (UTC))[reply]
From chomchom, Bengali numbers to Gauda (city), this user is putting false citation to get their POV across. Admins in Wiki need to look at this. It is unacceptable, the user is putting fake citation or fake claims - that the citation did not claim - to get their POV across. The version in Gauda (city) stood there for years. It stated that Malda in West Bengal was the main center, yet this user keeps reverting to their version. (96.240.28.30 (talk) 05:55, 10 February 2020 (UTC))[reply]
Which fake claims or false citation you are talking about? Let me suggest you something, keep calm, stay out of wikipedia for a while, appeal for a WP:Standard offer and come with a better mindset. Unnecessarily involving in disputes, war-mongering will get you nowhere. You have been IP-hopping in a number of articles. Za-ari-masen (talk) 06:10, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]