Talk:Shutterfly

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly those representing the subject of the article, are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent.

Sounds like an ad[edit]

This sounds like an ad....

So change it... I have made some modifications. This article isn't very good right now, but I don't think notability is an issue because it was one of the first companies to do internet printing. TastyCakes 06:30, 20 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Rewritten[edit]

"See also" should not include links to other companies, or people. If the people are important, they deserve mention in the article. I also NPOVed the language, because who exactly the company was responding to re: changes is irrelevant. MSJapan 15:08, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is an advertisement!! uyi 10:19, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

Wow, who changed this article. It's really crappy now. Shutterfly also offers their Progallery service line which is an online infrastructure for budding photographers. Jesus, the link on this page doesn't even work...

Notable per WP:CORP, WP:WEB. Works with Flikr, etc. I'm fixing the tags, stubify it. Bearian (talk) 16:13, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No criticism?[edit]

It still reads like an advertisement. Where is the NPOV especially considering, that this site is getting horrible reviews for their buggy site (see the Cnet review). It needs a section covering these criticisms! 119.92.109.147 (talk) 13:26, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Rewrite attempt[edit]

I agree with the above statement that criticisms need to be added in. Unfortunately I don't have the time today —would love it if somebody else got around to it. For my part, I just attempted to rewrite it in a way which made it sound less like it was copy and pasted from their front-page (gush = yech). Hope it helped a bit. ☯ Rodomontade (talk) ☯ 17:12, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Webloyalty[edit]

I reverted this edit which was sourced to a blog and was rather overweight. It looks to be a genuine controversy, but it needs to be properly sourced and neutrally worded. January ^(talk) 18:57, 7 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Removed My Little Pony reference[edit]

I removed the text from the Features section that discussed a My Little Pony typo. It doesn't belong in this article. It was also unsourced. Mjworthey (talk) 16:49, 17 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Well, Fluttershy is often confused with Shutterfly. J4lambert (talk) 16:00, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Cost to use? Requirments?[edit]

This article says nothing about fees to use the service, and how it's paid for. And it would be nice to know if there are any requirements, such as minimum number of photos bought (some sites do have such requirements). I actually came here to find that out. 140.147.236.195 (talk) 13:46, 13 December 2011 (UTC)Stephen Kosciesza[reply]

External Links[edit]

The External Links section was a collection of outdated news articles, plus one scare story not referenced in the article proper. I've removed all but the link to the company website. tlesher (talk) 18:22, 4 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Blacklisted Links Found on Shutterfly[edit]

Cyberbot II has detected links on Shutterfly which have been added to the blacklist, either globally or locally. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed or are highly inappropriate for Wikipedia. The addition will be logged at one of these locations: local or global If you believe the specific link should be exempt from the blacklist, you may request that it is white-listed. Alternatively, you may request that the link is removed from or altered on the blacklist locally or globally. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. Please do not remove the tag until the issue is resolved. You may set the invisible parameter to "true" whilst requests to white-list are being processed. Should you require any help with this process, please ask at the help desk.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:

http://www.shutterfly.com/
Triggered by \bshutterfly\.com\b on the global blacklist
http://www.shutterfly.com/about/com_sub_facts.jsp
Triggered by \bshutterfly\.com\b on the global blacklist
http://ir.shutterfly.com/releasedetail.cfm?ReleaseID=202218
Triggered by \bshutterfly\.com\b on the global blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 16:44, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Blacklisted Links Found on Shutterfly[edit]

Cyberbot II has detected links on Shutterfly which have been added to the blacklist, either globally or locally. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed or are highly inappropriate for Wikipedia. The addition will be logged at one of these locations: local or global If you believe the specific link should be exempt from the blacklist, you may request that it is white-listed. Alternatively, you may request that the link is removed from or altered on the blacklist locally or globally. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. Please do not remove the tag until the issue is resolved. You may set the invisible parameter to "true" whilst requests to white-list are being processed. Should you require any help with this process, please ask at the help desk.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:

http://ir.shutterfly.com/releasedetail.cfm?ReleaseID=202218
Triggered by \bshutterfly\.com\b on the global blacklist
http://www.shutterfly.com/
Triggered by \bshutterfly\.com\b on the global blacklist
http://www.shutterfly.com/about/com_sub_facts.jsp
Triggered by \bshutterfly\.com\b on the global blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 00:27, 14 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Untitled comment from 1 May 2017[edit]

5/1/2017: 3rd sentence of article looks wrong!!!!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 137.164.12.107 (talk) 20:24, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Suppressed info: Illegal data mining through illegal use of facial recognition[edit]

Shutterfly works with illegal facial recognition without the approval of those people in the photos. http://fortune.com/2015/06/18/shutterfly-lawsuit-facial-recognition/ and http://www.chicagotribune.com/business/ct-facial-recognition-lawsuit-0413-biz-20160412-story.html This info belongs in the article! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2003:8C:4C1C:3F00:E821:41FA:91CE:8913 (talk) 18:09, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Microsoft partnership[edit]

Around 2001 they had a partnership with Microsoft and I think some Shutterfly features were built into Windows XP. Any details? Why did this partnership end, and when? Equinox ◑ 06:02, 26 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]