Talk:Siege of Avignon (1226)

	France portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Military history: European / French / Medieval / Crusades B‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

B

This article has been rated as B-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	European military history task force
	French military history task force
	Medieval warfare task force (c. 500 – c. 1500)
	Crusades task force

"Referencing and citation: criterion not met"[edit]

@Gog the Mild: Can you explain? Thanks, Srnec (talk) 13:39, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Srnec, certainly. I tagged it as of interest to the MilHist Project. I made no assessment judgement. The MilHist bot came along and assessed it as C. I assume that it was confused by the block quotes, it may have thought that the breaks immediately before them were paragraph endings with no cites; this is purely a guess. While I am here I am happy to upgrade it to B. A nice, and fascinating, piece of work. I hope that you intend to take it to GAN. Cheers. Gog the Mild (talk) 14:01, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The Bot doesn't know about blockquotes. I suppose I could teach it. Another quirk is that the Bot thought the article was biographical, because it was categorised as being about King Louis VIII. (Also, but not in error, it reported that Beaucaire is a disambig, and that Choffel, Jones and Petit-Dutaillis are not used.) Gog is quite right about it being nice and fascinating, and I would encourage you to take it to GAN. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 19:27, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The Bot has now been taught to recognise blockquotes. (It also rates the article as GA-worthy.

) Hawkeye7 (discuss) 21:47, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you both. I will consider GAN, but I was intending to add more from Choffel, Jones and Petit-Dutaillis. Srnec (talk) 23:49, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]