Talk:Sikh music

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

WikiProject class rating[edit]

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 19:51, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violation[edit]

Practically the entire section on "Sikh musicians" is plagiarized from G.S. Mansukhani's Indian Classical Music and Sikh Kirtan. It will need to be deleted, and content written that cites its sources. DrBaldhead (talk) 01:39, 1 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Sikh music. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:14, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Please beware of people who are making up their own counts of raags - this is not the consensus of Sikhs or authorities such as Akaal Takht. There are 31 main raags in Sri Guru Granth Sahib with expansions of those raags which are almost like sub-raags. A search on ALL verified Sikh websites including SGPC will give you same results. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:646:8800:15C3:3439:E666:866F:E44 (talk) 01:40, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please can someone intervene and stop srsseehra from publishing false propaganda on this page that does not even have official credible sources? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Amo247 (talkcontribs) 07:08, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Protected edit request on 29 December 2020[edit]

The Sikh holy scripture, Guru Granth Sahib, is composed in and divided by 60 ragas or melodies. This is a combination of 39 single raags and 21 "Mishrat" raags (a raag composed by combining two or three raags together).

Mishrat (Mixed)Raags of Sri Guru Granth Sahib:

1. Gauri Deepaki

2. Gauri Poorabi

3. Gauri Guarairee

4. Gauri Chaitee

5. Gauri Bairagan

6. Gauri Poorabi Deepaki

7. Gauri Malva

8. Gauri Mala

9. Gauri Majh

10. Gauri Sorath

11. Asa Kafi

12. Asa Asavari

13. Tilang Kafi

14. Suhee Kafi

15. Suhee Lalit

16. Bilaval Gound

17. Maru Kafi

18. Basant Hindol

19. Kaliyan Bhopali

20. Parbhati Bibhas

21. Bibhas Parbhati

Single Raags of Sri Guru Granth Sahib:

1. Asa

2. Gujari

3. Dhanasri

4. Siri

5. Majh

6. Gauri

7. Gauri Dakhani (Since Dakhani is not a raag. Hence this raag is not considered as Mixed (Mishrit)).

8. Asavari

9. Devgandhari

10. Bihagra

11. Vadhans

12. Vadhans Dakhani

13. Sorath

14. Jaitsri

15. Todi

16. Bairarri

17. Tilang

18. Suhee

19. Bilaval

20. Bilaval Dakhani

21. Gound

22. Ramkali

23. Ramkali Dakhani

24. Nut

25. Nut Narayan

26. Mali Gaura

27. Maru

28. Maru Dakhani

29. Tukhari

30. Kedara

31. Bhairo

32. Basant

33. Sarang

34. Malhar

35. Kanra

36. Kaliyan

37. Parbhati

38. Parbhati Dakhani

39. Jaijaivanti Srsseehra (talk) 09:02, 29 December 2020 (UTC)  Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 11:08, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The user Srsseehra is still posting false and inaccurate information. Admins, please intercept. He has already been warned a number of times. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Amo247 (talkcontribs) 05:32, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 18:52, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]