Talk:Silver & Black (unproduced film)

This article was nominated for deletion on 10 January 2019. The result of the discussion was speedy keep.

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Comic book films task force.

Comics: Marvel / Films Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! If you would like to participate, you can help with the current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project's talk page.ComicsWikipedia:WikiProject ComicsTemplate:WikiProject ComicsComics articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Related work groups:
/
	This article is supported by Marvel Comics work group.
	This article is supported by Comic book films work group.

Split Development into two sections?[edit]

I think that the "Development" section should be split into two sections, "History", for the parts about Felicia Hardy's planned appearance in Spider-Man 4 and the planned female oriented spin-off to Amazing Spider-Man 2, and "Development", for the parts about the Sony's Marvel Universe film. ARZ100 (talk) 19:30, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I understand what you are saying here, but because one of those two sections would only be a single short paragraph I do not think it justifies the subheadings. It is essentially like that at the moment just without the explicit labels. - adamstom97 (talk) 03:51, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

My suggested "History" section would include the second paragraph of "Development", which is quite long and talks about Sony's planned spin-off of the Amazing Spider-Man 2. ARZ100 (talk) 03:58, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

In that case, there would only be a single paragraph for the development section, which is just the opposite of what I was saying before. - adamstom97 (talk) 04:45, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, that's true. ARZ100 (talk) 15:43, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Why is there a page on this?[edit]

Multiple other films dont have pages even though they didnt enter production yet even though this film didnt even film anything it has an article. Explain? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bearbro123 (talk • contribs) 16:36, 18 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The development history of this film is much more detailed than for other films. Some development histories can simply exist as a section in another article, like at The Winter of Frankie Machine, while this particular history is too detailed to merge to the broader article. Erik (talk | contrib) ^{(ping me)} 19:22, 18 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]