Talk:Sim RPG Maker

This article was nominated for deletion on 1 April 2006. The result of the discussion was merge.

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Should it be merged?[edit]

I feel that the two makers should be kept separate. There are several reasons for this.

First of all, the type of games they make fall into different categories. While it is possible to make tatical style games using the regular RPG Maker, it is not as common a practice as making traditional style RPGs. Sim RPG Maker is similar to the other makers in some ways, but I feel that it is different enough that it should be kept separate.

Second, the RPG Maker main page seems too cluttered. Sim RPG Maker would be a small footnote that would seem out of place as a section on the same page as the other makers. With its own page, it can clearly be differentiated from the other Makers.

Finally, I don't want to see any information lost. There aren't a whole lot of places to find information of Sim RPG Maker 95 out there. If they are out there, I haven't found them. I hope to see this page grow and become a useful and well designed article.

  -Turbo852

They're totally different concepts and programs, and I strongly believe they should stay seperate. However, I do believe the vote has already taken place. DMAJohnson 23:28, 13 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I think they should be merged. It is still part of the RPG Maker series, so it should just have, maybe one section in the article. M2K 23:32, 13 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I removed the merger notice. Each installment WILL have it's own page, the changes have already started. merging would just screw everything up, as the current RPG Maker article is being replaced by RPG Maker series, and then apparently the RPG Maker article will become the article for the first Playstation installment, since it's the only one with the title of just "RPG Maker" Valkysas 15:38, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

All RPG Makers Should Be Seperate[edit]

RPG Makers is a broad category that it seems people are throwing all RPG Makers into one entry. Each is distinctly different, with different design, maps, and concepts included in each, and various translators for each version. Give me some time to try and update a few of the pages and you may see what I mean...

DEJU: (it said 'Biased', technically you mean merge) why does anyonewant to merge this with RPG maker??? It's a completly different program (well not really but) it's not in the mainstream of the series... It will destroy the purpose of the set... Just don't do it, it won't work...

Yes. RPG makers 2000, 2003, and 95 should have one article but it gets to a point where your merging apples with orannges... If it's not reasonably the same thing, don't merge it

          -Dejuismaster

Separate[edit]

Though made by the same company, SRPG95 and the RM* series are completely separate, and the way they work is quite different. The interfaces are drastically different as well. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Natso (talk • contribs) 18:35, August 22, 2007 (UTC).

Interfaces don't matter much. As for "the way they work"... you give not one single specific detail on how they actually are different. The only visible difference is the "Sim" in the title, but that's not explained either. How is this not a mere RPG Maker? -- Jokes Free4Me (talk) 00:03, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Romaji Translation[edit]

I put up the original title for the game which is "シミューレーションRPGツクール95" and can be translated into romaji as Shimyūrēshon RPG Tsukūru 95. The Japanese don't have an "r" sound, rather a sound that's a mix between "r" and "l". So "Shimyūrēshon" is correct, there is no reason to go and change it to "Shimyūlēshon." Regardless, I just wanted to make it apparent to all who don't know, so that they don't question the translation. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.26.37.125 (talk) 05:20, 16 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Sim RPG Maker. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090925171937/http://tkool.jp/products/srpg95/index.html to http://tkool.jp/products/srpg95/index.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:08, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]