Talk:Singel Uitgeverijen

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Proposed mergers into Singel Uitgeverijen[edit]

One publishing group with a shared history and present operations. Without the merger, these articles suffer from a lack of content, references, and updates. Please note that this is a merger discussion. Valid arguments are about information organization, not about notability. The notability of all Singel Uitgeverijen is assumed but irrelevant to the discussion. gidonb (talk) 12:44, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Done for Conserve (an imprint), but oppose for De Arbeiderspers and Nijgh & Van Ditmar as their long independent histories are best covered separately, with some possibility for expansion/referencing from the Dutch. Readers would be best served by having the distinct histories covered on separate pages. Klbrain (talk) 13:07, 8 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Closing, given the uncontested objection (and no support) for the remaining 2 proposals. Klbrain (talk) 10:30, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed merge of De Arbeiderspers into Singel Uitgeverijen[edit]

The content of De Arbeiderspers (slightly cleaned up) is BADLY needed at Singel Uitgeverijen. The current situation of excessive fragmentation contributes to a severe lack of upkeep at De Arbeiderspers and a nightmare of a user experience! gidonb (talk) 04:34, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

As there were no objections, I am moving ahead and going to merge. gidonb (talk) 02:59, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]